Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 595

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The unfalsified control concept and learning

Safonov, M.G., Tung-Ching Tsao·1997·IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Abstract

Without a plant model or other prejudicial assumptions, a theory is developed for identifying control laws which are consistent with performance objectives and past experimental data-possibly before the control laws are ever inserted in the feedback loop. The theory complements model-based methods such as H/sup /spl infin//-robust control theory by providing a precise characterization of how the set of suitable controllers shrinks when new experimental data is found to be inconsistent with prior assumptions or earlier data. When implemented in real time, the result is an adaptive switching controller. An example is included.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/9.587340

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 595

Metadata

Authors
Safonov, M. G., & Tsao, T.-C.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
1997-06
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
843-847
ISSN
0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112876741
Cited by
595
References
0
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The unfalsified control concept and learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/9.587340
The paper
Safonov, M. G., & Tsao, T.-C. (1997). The unfalsified control concept and learning. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.587340

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.