Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulation-based optimization of Markov reward processes

Open access
Marbach, P., Tsitsiklis, J.N.·2001·IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Abstract

This paper proposes a simulation-based algorithm for optimizing the average reward in a finite-state Markov reward process that depends on a set of parameters. As a special case, the method applies to Markov decision processes where optimization takes place within a parametrized set of policies. The algorithm relies on the regenerative structure of finite-state Markov processes, involves the simulation of a single sample path, and can be implemented online. A convergence result (with probability 1) is provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/9.905687

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Marbach, P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
2001
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
191-209
ISSN
0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120465407
Cited by
306
References
2
FWCI
28.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation-based optimization of Markov reward processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/9.905687
The paper
Marbach, P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (2001). Simulation-based optimization of Markov reward processes. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.905687

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.