The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-similarity through high-variability: statistical analysis of Ethernet LAN traffic at the source level
Abstract
A number of empirical studies of traffic measurements from a variety of working packet networks have demonstrated that actual network traffic is self-similar or long-range dependent in nature-in sharp contrast to commonly made traffic modeling assumptions. We provide a plausible physical explanation for the occurrence of self-similarity in local-area network (LAN) traffic. Our explanation is based on convergence results for processes that exhibit high variability and is supported by detailed statistical analyzes of real-time traffic measurements from Ethernet LANs at the level of individual sources. This paper is an extended version of Willinger et al. (1995). We develop here the mathematical results concerning the superposition of strictly alternating ON/OFF sources. Our key mathematical result states that the superposition of many ON/OFF sources (also known as packet-trains) with strictly alternating ON- and OFF-periods and whose ON-periods or OFF-periods exhibit the Noah effect produces aggregate network traffic that exhibits the Joseph effect. There is, moreover, a simple relation between the parameters describing the intensities of the Noah effect (high variability) and the Joseph effect (self-similarity). An extensive statistical analysis of high time-resolution Ethernet LAN traffic traces confirms that the data at the level of individual sources or source-destination pairs are consistent with the Noah effect. We also discuss implications of this simple physical explanation for the presence of self-similar traffic patterns in modern high-speed network traffic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Statistical mechanics of complex networks
Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.47 · Cited by 20,471
Outside the Closed World: On Using Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection
Sommer, R., & Paxson, V. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2010.25 · Cited by 2,085
Recommendations on Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance in the Internet
Braden, B., Clark, D., Crowcroft, J., Davie, B., Deering, S., Estrin, D., Floyd, S., Jacobson, V., Minshall, G., Partridge, C., et al. (1998) · doi:10.17487/rfc2309 · Cited by 1,318
A signal analysis of network traffic anomalies
Barford, P., Kline, J., Plonka, D., & Ron, A. (2002) · Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurment - IMW '02 · doi:10.1145/637201.637210 · Cited by 787
Difficulties in simulating the Internet
Floyd, S., & Paxson, V. (2001) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/90.944338 · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Willinger, W., Taqqu, M. S., Sherman, R., & Wilson, D. V.
- Venue
- IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-86
- ISSN
- 1063-6692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171873915
- Cited by
- 1,654
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 107.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-similarity through high-variability: statistical analysis of Ethernet LAN traffic at the source level. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/90.554723
- The paper
- Willinger, W., Taqqu, M. S., Sherman, R., & Wilson, D. V. (1997). Self-similarity through high-variability: statistical analysis of Ethernet LAN traffic at the source level. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. https://doi.org/10.1109/90.554723
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.