The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing fuzzy inference systems from data: An interpretability-oriented review
Open accessAbstract
Fuzzy inference systems (FIS) are widely used for process simulation or control. They can be designed either from expert knowledge or from data. For complex systems, FIS based on expert knowledge only may suffer from a loss of accuracy. This is the main incentive for using fuzzy rules inferred from data. Designing a FIS from data can be decomposed into two main phases: automatic rule generation and system optimization. Rule generation leads to a basic system with a given space partitioning and the corresponding set of rules. System optimization can be done at various levels. Variable selection can be an overall selection or it can be managed rule by rule. Rule base optimization aims to select the most useful rules and to optimize rule conclusions. Space partitioning can be improved by adding or removing fuzzy sets and by tuning membership function parameters. Structure optimization is of a major importance: selecting variables, reducing the rule base and optimizing the number of fuzzy sets. Over the years, many methods have become available for designing FIS from data. Their efficiency is usually characterized by a numerical performance index. However, for human-computer cooperation another criterion is needed: the rule interpretability. An implicit assumption states that fuzzy rules are by nature easy to be interpreted. This could be wrong when dealing with complex multivariable systems or when the generated partitioning is meaningless for experts. The paper analyzes the main methods for automatic rule generation and structure optimization. They are grouped into several families and compared according to the rule interpretability criterion. For this purpose, three conditions for a set of rules to be interpretable are defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Cited by
Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine
Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2019) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1312 · Cited by 1,885
Interpretable Decision Sets: A Joint Framework for Description and Prediction
Lakkaraju, H., Bach, S. H., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939874 · Cited by 687
What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
Holzinger, A., Biemann, C., Pattichis, C. S., & Kell, D. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.09923 · Cited by 636
XAIR: A Systematic Metareview of Explainable AI (XAI) Aligned to the Software Development Process
Clement, T., Kemmerzell, N., Abdelaal, M., & Amberg, M. (2023) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make5010006 · Cited by 131
Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Review
Vilone, G., & Longo, L. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.00093 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillaume, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 426-443
- ISSN
- 1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159371584
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing fuzzy inference systems from data: An interpretability-oriented review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/91.928739
- The paper
- Guillaume, S. (2001). Designing fuzzy inference systems from data: An interpretability-oriented review. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.928739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.