The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Video acceptability and frame rate
Abstract
The advantage of degrading the QoS of a multimedia session is that it reduces the network bandwidth required for distributed multimedia applications, increasing the number of users that a multimedia server can support concurrently. Experimentation shows that users perceive a reduced frame rate for a continuous-media stream differently, depending on the content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming
Seufert, M., Egger, S., Slanina, M., Zinner, T., Hoßfeld, T., & Tran-Gia, P. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2360940 · Cited by 844
Power-rate-distortion analysis for wireless video communication under energy constraints
He, Z., Liang, Y., Chen, L., Ahmad, I., & Wu, D. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2005.846433 · Cited by 309
The effects of frame rate and resolution on users playing first person shooter games
Claypool, M., Claypool, K., & Damaa, F. (2006) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.648609 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Apteker, R. T., Fisher, J. A., Kisimov, V. S., & Neishlos, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Multimedia
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 32-40
- ISSN
- 1070-986X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017343233
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Video acceptability and frame rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/93.410510
- The paper
- Apteker, R. T., Fisher, J. A., Kisimov, V. S., & Neishlos, H. (1995). Video acceptability and frame rate. IEEE Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.1109/93.410510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
