Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 684

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infomax and maximum likelihood for blind source separation

Cardoso, J.-F.·1997·IEEE Signal Processing Letters

Abstract

Algorithms for the blind separation of sources can be derived from several different principles. This article shows that the infomax (information-maximization) principle is equivalent to the maximum likelihood. The application of the infomax principle to source separation consists of maximizing an output entropy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/97.566704

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 684

Metadata

Authors
Cardoso, J.-F.
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
Published
1997-04
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
112-114
ISSN
  • 1070-9908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2361
OpenAlex
W2143132653
Cited by
684
References
1
FWCI
32.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infomax and maximum likelihood for blind source separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/97.566704
The paper
Cardoso, J.-F. (1997). Infomax and maximum likelihood for blind source separation. IEEE Signal Processing Letters. https://doi.org/10.1109/97.566704

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.