The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices
Abstract
Instrumenting the physical world through large networks of wireless sensor nodes, particularly for applications like environmental monitoring of water and soil, requires that these nodes be very small, lightweight, untethered, and unobtrusive. The problem of localization, that is, determining where a given node is physically located in a network, is a challenging one, and yet extremely crucial for many of these applications. Practical considerations such as the small size, form factor, cost and power constraints of nodes preclude the reliance on GPS of all nodes in these networks. We review localization techniques and evaluate the effectiveness of a very simple connectivity metric method for localization in outdoor environments that makes use of the inherent RF communications capabilities of these devices. A fixed number of reference points in the network with overlapping regions of coverage transmit periodic beacon signals. Nodes use a simple connectivity metric, which is more robust to environmental vagaries, to infer proximity to a given subset of these reference points. Nodes localize themselves to the centroid of their proximate reference points. The accuracy of localization is then dependent on the separation distance between two-adjacent reference points and the transmission range of these reference points. Initial experimental results show that the accuracy for 90 percent of our data points is within one-third of the separation distance. However, future work is needed to extend the technique to more cluttered environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system
Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2002) · Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2000.832252 · Cited by 8,380
Cited by
Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA
Niculescu, D., & Nath, B. (2004) · IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2003.1209196 · Cited by 2,108
Localization for mobile sensor networks
Hu, L., & Evans, D. (2004) · Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/1023720.1023726 · Cited by 1,050
A Probabilistic Approach to WLAN User Location Estimation
Roos, T., Myllymäki, P., Tirri, H., Misikangas, P., & Sievänen, J. (2002) · International Journal of Wireless Information Networks · doi:10.1023/a:1016003126882 · Cited by 854
Recursive position estimation in sensor networks
Albowicz, J., Chen, A., & Zhang, L. (2005) · Proceedings Ninth International Conference on Network Protocols. ICNP 2001 · doi:10.1109/icnp.2001.992758 · Cited by 363
Abuaddous, H. Y., Kaur, G., Jyoti, K., Mittal, N., Mahajan, S., Pandit, A. K., Alsoud, A. R., & Abualigah, L. (2023) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-022-07590-y · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Personal Communications
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 28-34
- ISSN
- 1070-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119362555
- Cited by
- 3,592
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/98.878533
- The paper
- Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2000). GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/98.878533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.