Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stability analysis of networked control systems

·1999·Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251)

Abstract

We introduce a control network protocol, try-once-discard (TOD), for networked control systems (NCS), and provide, for the first time, an analytic proof of global exponential stability for both the new protocol and the commonly used statically scheduled access methods. Controllers are designed without regarding the presence of the network in the feedback loop, so consequently many controller design techniques may be employed. The performance of the new network protocol and the statically scheduled protocols are compared in simulations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/acc.1999.786599

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Venue
Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
1999
Pages
2876-2880 vol.4
ISSN
0743-1619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1641453282
Cited by
473
References
8
FWCI
22.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability analysis of networked control systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/acc.1999.786599
The paper
Stability analysis of networked control systems. (1999). Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251). https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.1999.786599

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.