A decision framework for an adaptive behavioral intervention for physical activity using hybrid model predictive control
Abstract
Physical inactivity is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Many physical activity behavioral interventions at present have shown limited success addressing the problem from a long-term perspective that includes maintenance. This paper proposes the design of a decision algorithm for a mobile and wireless health (mHealth) adaptive intervention that is based on control engineering concepts. The design process relies on a behavioral dynamical model based on Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), with a controller formulation based on hybrid model predictive control (HMPC) being used to implement the decision scheme. The discrete and logical features of HMPC coincide naturally with the categorical nature of the intervention components and the logical decisions that are particular to an intervention for physical activity. The intervention incorporates an online controller reconfiguration mode that applies changes in the penalty weights to accomplish the transition between the behavioral initiation and maintenance training stages. Simulation results are presented to illustrate the performance of the controller using a hypothetical model for physical activity interventions, under realistic conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Model predictive control, recommender systems, agent-based modeling, or Bayesian network analysis are plausible personalization algorithm strategies.
“Model predictive control [40–43], recommender systems [44], agent-based modeling [45], or Bayesian network analysis [46] are all plausible personalization algorithm strategies.”
From Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world (2016) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Martin, C. A., Rivera, D. E., & Hekler, E. B.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- 2016 American Control Conference (ACC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-07
- Pages
- 3576-3581
- ISSN
- 0743-1619 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2476010196
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 27.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- physical activity, hybrid model predictive control, mobile health, social cognitive theory, intervention maintenance, physical inactivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review