The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cloud-Assisted IoT-Based SCADA Systems Security: A Review of the State of the Art and Future Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Industrial systems always prefer to reduce their operational expenses. To support such reductions, they need solutions that are capable of providing stability, fault tolerance, and flexibility. One such solution for industrial systems is cyber physical system (CPS) integration with the Internet of Things (IoT) utilizing cloud computing services. These CPSs can be considered as smart industrial systems, with their most prevalent applications in smart transportation, smart grids, smart medical and eHealthcare systems, and many more. These industrial CPSs mostly utilize supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems to control and monitor their critical infrastructure (CI). For example, WebSCADA is an application used for smart medical technologies, making improved patient monitoring and more timely decisions possible. The focus of the study presented in this paper is to highlight the security challenges that the industrial SCADA systems face in an IoT-cloud environment. Classical SCADA systems are already lacking in proper security measures; however, with the integration of complex new architectures for the future Internet based on the concepts of IoT, cloud computing, mobile wireless sensor networks, and so on, there are large issues at stakes in the security and deployment of these classical systems. Therefore, the integration of these future Internet concepts needs more research effort. This paper, along with highlighting the security challenges of these CI's, also provides the existing best practices and recommendations for improving and maintaining security. Finally, this paper briefly describes future research directions to secure these critical CPSs and help the research community in identifying the research gaps in this regard.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems
Cherdantseva, Y., Burnap, P., Blyth, A., Eden, P., Jones, K., Soulsby, H., & Stoddart, K. (2016) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.009 · Cited by 606 · cited 1×
“Research challenges faced by SCADA systems in risk assessment are outlined in [37] and [38].”
BackgroundA Taxonomy of Cyber Attacks on SCADA Systems
Zhu, B., Joseph, A., & Sastry, S. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Internet of Things and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing · doi:10.1109/ithings/cpscom.2011.34 · Cited by 458 · cited 1×
“Following is a brief overview of few such good practices that helps in improving the security of IoT and cloud based SCADA systems, keeping in view the guidelines of NIST SP 800-53 [40], NIST SP 800-53, Revision 4 [41], NIST SP 800-82, Revision 2 [42], and other literature reviewed in the reference section.”
MethodA survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems
Knowles, W., Prince, D., Hutchison, D., Disso, J. F. P., & Jones, K. (2015) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.02.002 · Cited by 344
Cited by
A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2884906 · Cited by 637
A Survey on Emerging SDN and NFV Security Mechanisms for IoT Systems
Farris, I., Taleb, T., Khettab, Y., & Song, J. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2862350 · Cited by 402
Tange, K., De Donno, M., Fafoutis, X., & Dragoni, N. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3011208 · Cited by 410
“Some older surveys dated back to 2015 and 2016 mention IIoT security requirements [17], [18], but they also refrain from an in-depth discussion.”
BackgroundCybersecurity for industrial control systems: A survey
Bhamare, D., Zolanvari, M., Erbad, A., Jain, R., Khan, K., & Meskin, N. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2019.101677 · Cited by 394
The Security of Big Data in Fog-Enabled IoT Applications Including Blockchain: A Survey
Tariq, N., Asim, M., Al-Obeidat, F., Zubair Farooqi, M., Baker, T., Hammoudeh, M., & Ghafir, I. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19081788 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Sajid, A., Abbas, H., & Saleem, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 1375-1384
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2322987107
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 43.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloud-Assisted IoT-Based SCADA Systems Security: A Review of the State of the Art and Future Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2016.2549047
- The paper
- Sajid, A., Abbas, H., & Saleem, K. (2016). Cloud-Assisted IoT-Based SCADA Systems Security: A Review of the State of the Art and Future Challenges. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2549047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.