Weighted visibility graph with complex network features in the detection of epilepsy
Open accessAbstract
Epilepsy detection from electrical characteristics of EEG signals obtained from the brain of undergone subject is a challenge task for both research and neurologist due to the non-stationary and chaotic nature of EEG signals. As epileptic EEG signals contain huge fluctuating information about the functional behavior of the brain, it is hard to distinguish the fundamental dynamic, complex network of EEG signals without considering the strength among the nodes as they are connected with each other on the basis of these strengths. The prior research on natural visibility graph did not consider this issue in epileptic seizure, although it is a very important key point to have representative information from the signals. Hence, this paper aims to introduce a new idea for epilepsy detection using complex network statistical properties by measuring different strengths of the edges in natural visibility graph theory, which is considered as weight. Thus, the proposed method is named “weighted visibility graph”. In this proposed method, first, the epileptic EEG signals are transformed into complex network and then two important statistical properties of a network such as modularity and average weighted degree used for extracting the imperative characteristics from a network of EEG signals. After that, the extracted features are evaluated by two modern machine-learning classifiers such as, support vector machine with a different kernel function and k-nearest neighbor. The experimental results demonstrate that the combined effect of both features is valuable for network metrics to characterize the EEG time series signals in case of weighted complex network generating up to 100% classification accuracy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies using complex networks as preprocessing convert raw time series into graphs, extract topological statistics, and feed them into DNN models.
“In particular, most of the studies in this area use complex networks to convert raw time series data into graphs and then extract the topological statistics (such as cluster coefficients, path lengths, and node edge distributions) from the graphs and feed them into the DNN models.”
From TVGeAN: Tensor Visibility Graph-Enhanced Attention Network for Versatile Multivariant Time Series Learning Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
The paper’s opening summary describes converting EEG time series into a complex network and extracting network statistics, including modularity and average weighted degree. But it feeds those features into SVM and KNN classifiers, not DNN models. The paper also does not establish that most studies use the claimed pipeline. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEdge weights in TVG are defined based on the visibility angle algorithm.
“the weights of the edges are defined based on the visibility angle algorithm [28].”
From TVGeAN: Tensor Visibility Graph-Enhanced Attention Network for Versatile Multivariant Time Series Learning Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
From time series to complex networks: the visibility graph
Lacasa, L., Luque, B., Ballesteros, F., Luque, J., & Nuño, J. C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709247105 · Cited by 1,826 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- [1]S. Supriya, S. Siuly, H. Wang, and Y. Zhang, ‘‘Analyzing EEG signal data for detection of epileptic seizure: Introducing weight on visibility graph with complex network feature,’’ in Proc. Australasian Database Conf. (ADC), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2016, pp. 56–66.
- [2]R. Meier, H. Dittrich, A. Schulze-Bonhage, A. Aertsen, ‘‘Detecting epilep-tic seizures in long-term human EEG: A new approach to automatic online and real-time detection and classification of polymorphic seizure patterns,’’ J. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 119–131, Jun. 2008.
- [3]T. Körner, Fourier Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.
- [4]G. E. P. Box, G. M. Jenkins and G. C. Reinsel, Time Series Analysis: Fore-casting and Control(Series in Probability and Statistics), 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2016.
- [5]D. Percival and A. Walden, Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
- [7]H. Kantz and T. Schreiber, Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003.
- [8]A. S. L. O. Campanharo, F. M. Ramos, E. E. N. Macau, R. R. Rosa, M. J. A. Bolzan, and L. D. A. Sá, ‘‘Searching chaos and coherent structures in the atmospheric turbulence above the Amazon forest,’’ Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, Math., Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 366, no. 1865, pp. 579–589, 2008.
- [9]A. S. L. O. Campanharo, M. I. Sirer, R. D. Malmgren, F. M. Ramos, and L. A. N. Amaral, ‘‘duality between time series and networks,’’ PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 8, p. e23378, 2011.
- [10]S. Siuly and Y. Li, ‘‘Designing a robust feature extraction method based on optimum allocation and principal component analysis for epileptic EEG signal classification,’’ Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 29–42, Apr. 2015.
- [11]S. Siuly and Y. Li, ‘‘A novel statistical algorithm for multiclass EEG signal classification,’’ Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 34, pp. 154–167, Sep. 2014.
- [12]V. Srinivasan, C. Eswaran, and A. Sriraam, ‘‘Artificial neural network based epileptic detection using time-domain and frequency-domain fea-tures,’’ J. Med. Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 647–660, Dec. 2005. VOLUME 4, 2016 6565 S. Supriya et al.: WVG With Complex Network Features in the Detection of Epilepsy
- [13]J. Zhang and M. Small, ‘‘Complex network from pseudoperiodic time series: Topology versus dynamics,’’ Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 96, no. 23, p. 238701, Jun. 2006.
- [14]C. J. Stam and E. C. W. van Straaten, ‘‘The organization of physiological brain networks,’’ Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 1067–1087, 2012.
- [16]M. Ahmadlou, H. Adeli, and A. Adeli, ‘‘New diagnostic EEG markers of the Alzheimer’s disease using visibility graph,’’ J. Neural Transmiss., vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 1099–1109, Sep. 2010.
- [17]X. Tang et al., ‘‘New Approach to Epileptic Diagnosis Using Visibility Graph of High-Frequency Signal,’’ Clin. EEG Neurosci., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 150–156, 2013.
- [18]Y. Ni, Y. Wang, T. Yu and X. Li, ‘‘Analysis of epileptic seizures with complex network,’’ Comput. Math. Methods Med., vol. 2014, pp. 1–6, 2014.
- [19]G. Zhu, Y. Li, and P. Wen, ‘‘Epileptic seizure detection in EEGs signals using a fast weighted horizontal visibility algorithm,’’ Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 64–75, Jul. 2014.
- [20]S. Supriya, S. Siuly, and Y. Zhang, ‘‘Automatic epilepsy detection from EEG introducing a new edge weight method in the complex network,’’ IET Electron. Lett., vol. 52, no. 17, pp. 1430–1432, Aug. 2016.
- [21]S. Bhaduri and D. Ghosh, ‘‘Electroencephalographic data analysis with visibility graph technique for quantitative assessment of brain dysfunc-tion,’’ Clin. EEG Neurosci., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 218–223, 2014.
- [22]R. G. Andrzejak, K. Lehnertz, F. Mormann, C. Rieke, P. David, and C. E. Elger, ‘‘Indications of nonlinear deterministic and finite-dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity: Dependence on record-ing region and brain stat,’’ Phys. Rev. E, vol. 64, no. 6, p. 061907, Dec. 2001.
- [23]J. Liu, H. Liu, Z. Huang, and Q. Tang, ‘‘Differ multivariate timeseries from each other based on a simple multiplex visibility graphs technique,’’ in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Intell. Control Inf. Process. (ICICIP), Nov. 2015, pp. 289–295.
- [24]F. Wang, Q. Meng, and Y. Chen, ‘‘A novel feature extraction method for epileptic EEG based on degree distribution of complex network,’’ Wseas Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl., vol. 12, nos. 2224–3402, p. 10, 2015.
- [25]R. Polikar, Pattern Recognition (Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engi-neering), M. Akay, Ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2006.
- [26]M. E. Newman, ‘‘Analysis of weighted networks,’’ Phys. Rev. E, vol. 70, no. 5, p. 056131, Nov. 2004.
- [27]V. Blondel, J. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre, ‘‘Fast unfolding of communities in large networks,’’ J. Statist. Mech., Theory Experiment, vol. 2008, no. 10, p. P10008, 2008.
- [28]I. Antoniou and E. Tsompa, ‘‘Statistical analysis of weighted networks,’’ Discrete Dyn. Nature Soc., vol. 2008, pp. 1–16, 2008.
- [29]A. Andrew, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Ker-nel?based Learning Methods. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
- [30]T. Cover and P. Hart, ‘‘Nearest neighbor pattern classification,’’ IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–27, Jan. 1967.
- [31]S. Siuly, Y. Li, and P. Wen, ‘‘Clustering technique-based least square support vector machine for EEG signal classification,’’ Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 358–372, 2011.
- [32]N. Nicolaou and J. Georgiou, ‘‘Detection of epileptic electroencephalo-gram based on permutation entropy and support vector machines,’’ Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 202–209, 2012.
- [33]Y. Kumar, M. Dewal, and R. Anand, ‘‘Epileptic seizure detection using DWT based fuzzy approximate entropy and support vector machine,’’ Neurocomputing, vol. 133, pp. 271–279, Jun. 2014.
- [34]H. Ghayab, Y. Li, S. Abdulla, M. Diykh, and X. Wan, ‘‘Classifica-tion of epileptic EEG signals based on simple random sampling and sequential feature selection,’’ Brain Informat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–91, 2016.
- [35]S. Husain and K. S. Rao, ‘‘An artificial neural network model for classi-fication of epileptic seizures using Huang–Hilber Transform,’’ Int. J. Soft Comput., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 23–33, 2014.
- [36]Y. Zhang, L. Sun, H. Song, and X. Cao, ‘‘Ubiquitous WSN for healthcare: Recent advances and future prospects,’’ IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 311–318, 2014. SUPRIYA SUPRIYA received the B.Eng. degree in information technology and the M.Eng. degree in computer science from Punjab Technical Uni-versity, Jalandhar, India. She is currently pursu-ing the Ph.D. degree with the Centre for Applied Informatics, College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Australia. Her research inter-ests are biomedical signal processing, signal clas-sification, detection and prediction of epileptic seizure, pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, deep Web, data mining, and Web mining. SIULY SIULY received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in statistics from the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and the Ph.D. degree in biomedi-cal engineering from the University of Southern Queensland, Australia, in 2012. She is a Research Fellow with the Centre for Applied Informat-ics, College of Engineering and Science, Victo-ria University, Australia. Her research interests are biomedical signal processing, signal classifica-tion, detection and prediction of epileptic seizure, brain–computer interface, machine learning, pattern recognition, and artifi-cial intelligence. HUA WANG received the Ph.D. degree in com-puter science from the University of Southern Queensland (USQ) in 2004. He was a Professor with USQ from 2011 to 2013. He is currently a Full-Time Professor with the Centre for Applied Informatics, Victoria University. He has authored or co-authored over 150 peer-reviewed research papers mainly in data security, data mining, access control, privacy and Web services, as well as their applications in the fields of e-health and e-environment. JINLI CAO received the Ph.D. degree in computer science from the University of Southern Queens-land, Australia, in 1997. He is currently an Active Researcher, where he is involved in database sys-tems, such as XML queries, keyword search, top-k queries in probabilistic databases, recom-mendation systems, decision support, and cloud computing. He has authored or co-authored over 90 research papers in international conferences and journals, such as the IEEE TRANSACTIONS on DISTRIBUTED and PARALLEL PROCESSING, the IEEE TRANSACTIONS on KNOWLEDGE and DATA ENGINEERING, the Journal of Computer and System Sciences, and the Computer Journal, and top conferences, such as WWW, WISE, and DASFAA. YANCHUN ZHANG is currently the Director of the Centre for Applied Informatics, and coor-dinates a multidisciplinary e-research program across the Victoria University. He is also an International Research Leader in databases, data mining, health informatics, Web information sys-tems, and Web services. He has authored over 220 research papers in international journals and conferences proceedings, and authored/edited 12 books. His major research interests include data mining, pattern recognition, machine learning, biomedical signal processing, databases, data management, e-health, environmental studies, and sensor networks. He is the Editor-in-Chief of World Wide Web Journal (Springer), and the Health Information Science and Systems. He is also the Chairman of the International Web Information Systems Engineering Society. 6566 VOLUME 4, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aydın, S., & Onbaşı, L. (2024) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-023-09931-5 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Baz, M. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12213320 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Supriya, S., Siuly, S., Wang, H., Cao, J., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 6554-6566
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2521472744
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 11.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Keywords
- seizure detection, EEG signals, complex networks, network modularity, epileptic seizure classification, network metrics, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review