The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Malaria Parasite Detection From Peripheral Blood Smear Images Using Deep Belief Networks
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose a novel method to identify the presence of malaria parasites in human peripheral blood smear images using a deep belief network (DBN). This paper introduces a trained model based on a DBN to classify 4100 peripheral blood smear images into the parasite or non-parasite class. The proposed DBN is pre-trained by stacking restricted Boltzmann machines using the contrastive divergence method for pre-training. To train the DBN, we extract features from the images and initialize the visible variables of the DBN. A concatenated feature of color and texture is used as a feature vector in this paper. Finally, the DBN is discriminatively fine-tuned using a backpropagation algorithm that computes the probability of class labels. The optimum size of the DBN architecture used in this paper is 484-600-600-600-600-2, in which the visible layer has 484 nodes and the output layer has two nodes with four hidden layers containing 600 hidden nodes in every layer. The proposed method has performed significantly better than the other state-of-the-art methods with an F-score of 89.66%, a sensitivity of 97.60%, and specificity of 95.92%. This paper is the first application of a DBN for malaria parasite detection in human peripheral blood smear images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., & Maenpaa, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017623 · Cited by 15,398
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879 · cited 7×
“DBN-related classification models are also used for 3-D object recognition [32], hand-written character recognition [24], [33], motion capture data modeling [34], [35], information retrieval [6], [36], and machine transliteration [37].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia using deep learning
Rehman, A., Abbas, N., Saba, T., Rahman, S. I. U., Mehmood, Z., & Kolivand, H. (2018) · Microscopy Research and Technique · doi:10.1002/jemt.23139 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Bibin, D., Nair, M. S., & Punitha, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 9099-9108
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2617959447
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Malaria Parasite Detection From Peripheral Blood Smear Images Using Deep Belief Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2017.2705642
- The paper
- Bibin, D., Nair, M. S., & Punitha, P. (2017). Malaria Parasite Detection From Peripheral Blood Smear Images Using Deep Belief Networks. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2705642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.