The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy-Preserving Data Mining: Methods, Metrics, and Applications
Open accessAbstract
The collection and analysis of data are continuously growing due to the pervasiveness of computing devices. The analysis of such information is fostering businesses and contributing beneficially to the society in many different fields. However, this storage and flow of possibly sensitive data poses serious privacy concerns. Methods that allow the knowledge extraction from data, while preserving privacy, are known as privacy-preserving data mining (PPDM) techniques. This paper surveys the most relevant PPDM techniques from the literature and the metrics used to evaluate such techniques and presents typical applications of PPDM methods in relevant fields. Furthermore, the current challenges and open issues in PPDM are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
The NIST definition of cloud computing
Mell, P. M., & Grance, T. (2011) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-145 · Cited by 11,795
k-ANONYMITY: A MODEL FOR PROTECTING PRIVACY
SWEENEY, L. (2002) · International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218488502001648 · Cited by 8,571
Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods
Rand, W. M. (1971) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356 · Cited by 6,566
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000042 · Cited by 5,557
Dwork, C. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11787006_1 · Cited by 5,291
Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models
Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.41 · Cited by 4,754
(1996) · Cited by 4,738
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Neal, R. M. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s518 · Cited by 4,571
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2013) · doi:10.1561/9781601988195 · Cited by 3,856
Cited by
Ikotun, A. M., Ezugwu, A. E., Abualigah, L., Abuhaija, B., & Heming, J. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.139 · Cited by 2,272
Iqbal, W., Abbas, H., Daneshmand, M., Rauf, B., & Bangash, Y. A. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2997651 · Cited by 356
Supply Chain 4.0: A Survey of Cyber Security Challenges, Solutions and Future Directions
Sobb, T., Turnbull, B., & Moustafa, N. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9111864 · Cited by 189
Singhal, A., Neveditsin, N., Tanveer, H., & Mago, V. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/50048 · Cited by 172
A Survey of Privacy Risks and Mitigation Strategies in the Artificial Intelligence Life Cycle
Shahriar, S., Allana, S., Hazratifard, S. M., & Dara, R. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3287195 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendes, R., & Vilela, J. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 10562-10582
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2626533970
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 17.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privacy-Preserving Data Mining: Methods, Metrics, and Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2017.2706947
- The paper
- Mendes, R., & Vilela, J. P. (2017). Privacy-Preserving Data Mining: Methods, Metrics, and Applications. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2706947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.