The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed Reputation Management for Secure and Efficient Vehicular Edge Computing and Networks
Open accessAbstract
Vehicular edge computing (VEC) is introduced to extend computing capacity to vehicular network edge recently. With the advent of VEC, service providers directly host services in close proximity of mobile vehicles for great improvements. As a result, a new networking paradigm, vehicular edge networks is emerged along with the development of VEC. However, it is necessary to address security issues for facilitating VEC well. In this paper, we focus on reputation management to ensure security protection and improve network efficiency in the implementation of VEC. A distributed reputation management system (DREAMS) is proposed, wherein VEC servers are adopted to execute local reputation management tasks for vehicles. This system has remarkable features for improving overall performance: 1) distributed reputation maintenance; 2) trusted reputation manifestation; 3) accurate reputation update; and 4) available reputation usage. In particular, we utilize multi-weighted subjective logic for accurate reputation update in DREAMS. To enrich reputation usage in DREAMS, service providers optimize resource allocation in computation offloading by considering reputation of vehicles. Numerical results indicate that DREAMS has great advantages in optimizing misbehavior detection and improving the recognition rate of misbehaving vehicles. Meanwhile, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our reputation-based resource allocation algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mobile-edge computing architecture: the role of mec in the internet of things
Sabella, D., Vaillant, A., Kuure, P., Rauschenbach, U., & Giust, F. (2016) · IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mce.2016.2590118 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Blockchain-based decentralized trust management in vehicular networks
Yang, Z., Yang, K., Lei, L., Zheng, K., & Leung, V. C. M. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2836144 · Cited by 932
Khan, R., Kumar, P., Jayakody, D. N. K., & Liyanage, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2933899 · Cited by 572
Raza, S., Wang, S., Ahmed, M., & Anwar, M. R. (2019) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1155/2019/3159762 · Cited by 265
Alalwany, E., & Mahgoub, I. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24020368 · Cited by 130
Decentralized Trust Evaluation in Vehicular Internet of Things
Guleng, S., Wu, C., Chen, X., Wang, X., Yoshinaga, T., & Ji, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2893262 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, X., Yu, R., Kang, J., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 25408-25420
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766896817
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed Reputation Management for Secure and Efficient Vehicular Edge Computing and Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2017.2769878
- The paper
- Huang, X., Yu, R., Kang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Distributed Reputation Management for Secure and Efficient Vehicular Edge Computing and Networks. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2769878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.