The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Edge of Things: The Big Picture on the Integration of Edge, IoT and the Cloud in a Distributed Computing Environment
Open accessAbstract
A centralized infrastructure system carries out existing data analytics and decision-making processes from our current highly virtualized platform of wireless networks and the Internet of Things (IoT) applications. There is a high possibility that these existing methods will encounter more challenges and issues in relation to network dynamics, resulting in a high overhead in the network response time, leading to latency and traffic. In order to avoid these problems in the network and achieve an optimum level of resource utilization, a new paradigm called edge computing (EC) is proposed to pave the way for the evolution of new age applications and services. With the integration of EC, the processing capabilities are pushed to the edge of network devices such as smart phones, sensor nodes, wearables, and on-board units, where data analytics and knowledge generation are performed which removes the necessity for a centralized system. Many IoT applications, such as smart cities, the smart grid, smart traffic lights, and smart vehicles, are rapidly upgrading their applications with EC, significantly improving response time as well as conserving network resources. Irrespective of the fact that EC shifts the workload from a centralized cloud to the edge, the analogy between EC and the cloud pertaining to factors such as resource management and computation optimization are still open to research studies. Hence, this paper aims to validate the efficiency and resourcefulness of EC. We extensively survey the edge systems and present a comparative study of cloud computing systems. After analyzing the different network properties in the system, the results show that EC systems perform better than cloud computing systems. Finally, the research challenges in implementing an EC system and future research directions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Edge computing: Vision and challenges
Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2579198 · Cited by 8,733
Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey on Architecture and Computation Offloading
Mach, P., & Becvar, Z. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2682318 · Cited by 3,258
Efficient multi-user computation offloading for mobile-edge cloud computing
Chen, X., Jiao, L., Li, W., & Fu, X. (2016) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2015.2487344 · Cited by 2,675
A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180 · Cited by 2,203
Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Mada, B., Flinck, H., Dutta, S., & Sabella, D. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2705720 · Cited by 1,775
Dynamic computation offloading for mobile-edge computing with energy harvesting devices
Mao, Y., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2016) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2016.2611964 · Cited by 1,705
A Survey on Mobile Edge Networks: Convergence of Computing, Caching and Communications
Wang, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., YANG, J., & Wang, W. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2685434 · Cited by 952
Collaborative Mobile Edge Computing in 5G Networks: New Paradigms, Scenarios, and Challenges
Tran, T. X., Hajisami, A., Pandey, P., & Pompili, D. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1600863 · Cited by 874
Delay-optimal computation task scheduling for mobile-edge computing systems
Liu, J., Mao, Y., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · doi:10.1109/isit.2016.7541539 · Cited by 759
Zhang, K., Mao, Y., Leng, S., He, Y., & ZHANG, Y. (2017) · IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine · doi:10.1109/mvt.2017.2668838 · Cited by 701
Cited by
Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems
Mutlag, A. A., Abd Ghani, M. K., Arunkumar, N., Mohammed, M. A., & Mohd, O. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.07.049 · Cited by 590
IoT in smart cities: A survey of technologies, practices and challenges
Syed, A. S., Sierra-Sosa, D., Kumar, A., & Elmaghraby, A. (2021) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities4020024 · Cited by 527
Edge-computing-driven Internet of Things: A Survey
Kong, L., Tan, J., Huang, J., Chen, G., Wang, S., Jin, X., Zeng, P., Khan, M., & Das, S. K. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555308 · Cited by 396
Raza, S., Wang, S., Ahmed, M., & Anwar, M. R. (2019) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1155/2019/3159762 · Cited by 265
Edge computing for Internet of Things: a survey, e-healthcare case study and future direction
Ray, P. P., Dash, D., & De, D. (2019) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.05.005 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- El-Sayed, H., Sankar, S., Prasad, M., Puthal, D., Gupta, A., Mohanty, M., & Lin, C.-T.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 1706-1717
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2772726293
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 30.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edge of Things: The Big Picture on the Integration of Edge, IoT and the Cloud in a Distributed Computing Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2017.2780087
- The paper
- El-Sayed, H., Sankar, S., Prasad, M., Puthal, D., Gupta, A., Mohanty, M., & Lin, C.-T. (2018). Edge of Things: The Big Picture on the Integration of Edge, IoT and the Cloud in a Distributed Computing Environment. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2780087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.