The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Extreme Learning Machine for Intrusion Detection
Open accessAbstract
Intrusion detection is a fundamental part of security tools, such as adaptive security appliances, intrusion detection systems, intrusion prevention systems, and firewalls. Various intrusion detection techniques are used, but their performance is an issue. Intrusion detection performance depends on accuracy, which needs to improve to decrease false alarms and to increase the detection rate. To resolve concerns on performance, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine (SVM), and other techniques have been used in recent work. Such techniques indicate limitations and are not efficient for use in large data sets, such as system and network data. The intrusion detection system is used in analyzing huge traffic data; thus, an efficient classification technique is necessary to overcome the issue. This problem is considered in this paper. Well-known machine learning techniques, namely, SVM, random forest, and extreme learning machine (ELM) are applied. These techniques are well-known because of their capability in classification. The NSL–knowledge discovery and data mining data set is used, which is considered a benchmark in the evaluation of intrusion detection mechanisms. The results indicate that ELM outperforms other approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Cited by
Network Intrusion Detection Combined Hybrid Sampling With Deep Hierarchical Network
Jiang, K., Wang, W., Wang, A., & Wu, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2973730 · Cited by 446
Color and engagement in touristic Instagram pictures: A machine learning approach
Yu, J., & Egger, R. (2021) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2021.103204 · Cited by 171
Stock selection with random forest: An exploitation of excess return in the Chinese stock market
Tan, Z., Yan, Z., & Zhu, G. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02310 · Cited by 107
“No modification is made to the algorithm, as it is believed that the original RF can have enough capacity to handle large number of variables in datasets and give rise to unbiased estimate for real world classification problems (Ahmad et al., 2018), including finance.”
BackgroundTS-IDS: Traffic-aware self-supervised learning for IoT Network Intrusion Detection
Nguyen, H., & Kashef, R. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110966 · Cited by 94
Collaborative Learning Based Sybil Attack Detection in Vehicular AD-HOC Networks (VANETS)
Azam, S., Bibi, M., Riaz, R., Rizvi, S. S., & Kwon, S. J. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22186934 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, I., Basheri, M., Iqbal, M. J., & Rahim, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 33789-33795
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807319534
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Extreme Learning Machine for Intrusion Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2841987
- The paper
- Ahmad, I., Basheri, M., Iqbal, M. J., & Rahim, A. (2018). Performance Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Extreme Learning Machine for Intrusion Detection. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2841987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.