The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fog Computing: Survey of Trends, Architectures, Requirements, and Research Directions
Open accessAbstract
Emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) require latency-aware computation for real-time application processing. In IoT environments, connected things generate a huge amount of data, which are generally referred to as big data. Data generated from IoT devices are generally processed in a cloud infrastructure because of the on-demand services and scalability features of the cloud computing paradigm. However, processing IoT application requests on the cloud exclusively is not an efficient solution for some IoT applications, especially time-sensitive ones. To address this issue, Fog computing, which resides in between cloud and IoT devices, was proposed. In general, in the Fog computing environment, IoT devices are connected to Fog devices. These Fog devices are located in close proximity to users and are responsible for intermediate computation and storage. One of the key challenges in running IoT applications in a Fog computing environment are resource allocation and task scheduling. Fog computing research is still in its infancy, and taxonomy-based investigation into the requirements of Fog infrastructure, platform, and applications mapped to current research is still required. This survey will help the industry and research community synthesize and identify the requirements for Fog computing. This paper starts with an overview of Fog computing in which the definition of Fog computing, research trends, and the technical differences between Fog and cloud are reviewed. Then, we investigate numerous proposed Fog computing architectures and describe the components of these architectures in detail. From this, the role of each component will be defined, which will help in the deployment of Fog computing. Next, a taxonomy of Fog computing is proposed by considering the requirements of the Fog computing paradigm. We also discuss existing research works and gaps in resource allocation and scheduling, fault tolerance, simulation tools, and Fog-based microservices. Finally, by addressing the limitations of current research works, we present some open issues, which will determine the future research direction for the Fog computing paradigm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Edge computing: Vision and challenges
Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2579198 · Cited by 8,733
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing · doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513 · Cited by 6,244
Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., & Brandic, I. (2009) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2008.12.001 · Cited by 5,937
Calheiros, R. N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., De Rose, C. A. F., & Buyya, R. (2011) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.995 · Cited by 4,948
Self-citationThe case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing
Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., & Davies, N. (2009) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2009.82 · Cited by 3,660
Fog and IoT: An Overview of Research Opportunities
Chiang, M., & Zhang, T. (2016) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2584538 · Cited by 2,362
Gupta, H., Vahid Dastjerdi, A., Ghosh, S. K., & Buyya, R. (2017) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.2509 · Cited by 1,649
A Survey of Fog Computing: Concepts, Applications and Issues
Yi, S., Li, C., & Li, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Mobile Big Data · doi:10.1145/2757384.2757397 · Cited by 1,339
Mobile edge computing, Fog et al.: A survey and analysis of security threats and challenges
Roman, R., Lopez, J., & Mambo, M. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.11.009 · Cited by 1,338
Rahmani, A. M., Gia, T. N., Negash, B., Anzanpour, A., Azimi, I., Jiang, M., & Liljeberg, P. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.02.014 · Cited by 1,198 · cited 1×
“[100] proposed a Fog-assisted system architecture for the healthcare system.”
Background
Cited by
Edge Computing in Industrial Internet of Things: Architecture, Advances and Challenges
Qiu, T., Chi, J., Zhou, X., Ning, Z., Atiquzzaman, M., & Wu, D. O. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3009103 · Cited by 857
AI for next generation computing: Emerging trends and future directions
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Ottaviani, C., Patros, P., Bahsoon, R., Shaghaghi, A., Golec, M., Stankovski, V., Wu, H., Abraham, A., et al. (2022) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100514 · Cited by 686
A Comprehensive Survey of RAN Architectures Toward 5G Mobile Communication System
Habibi, M. A., Nasimi, M., Han, B., & Schotten, H. D. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2919657 · Cited by 312
Towards edge computing in intelligent manufacturing: Past, present and future
Nain, G., Pattanaik, K. K., & Sharma, G. K. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.01.010 · Cited by 283
A survey on fog computing for the Internet of Things
Bellavista, P., Berrocal, J., Corradi, A., Das, S. K., Foschini, L., & Zanni, A. (2019) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.12.007 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Naha, R. K., Garg, S., Georgakopoulos, D., Jayaraman, P. P., Gao, L., Xiang, Y., & Ranjan, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 47980-48009
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809963016
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 40.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fog Computing: Survey of Trends, Architectures, Requirements, and Research Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2866491
- The paper
- Naha, R. K., Garg, S., Georgakopoulos, D., Jayaraman, P. P., Gao, L., Xiang, Y., & Ranjan, R. (2018). Fog Computing: Survey of Trends, Architectures, Requirements, and Research Directions. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2866491
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.