The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Learning Approach Combining Sparse Autoencoder With SVM for Network Intrusion Detection
Open accessAbstract
Network intrusion detection systems (NIDSs) provide a better solution to network security than other traditional network defense technologies, such as firewall systems. The success of NIDS is highly dependent on the performance of the algorithms and improvement methods used to increase the classification accuracy and decrease the training and testing times of the algorithms. We propose an effective deep learning approach, self-taught learning (STL)-IDS, based on the STL framework. The proposed approach is used for feature learning and dimensionality reduction. It reduces training and testing time considerably and effectively improves the prediction accuracy of support vector machines (SVM) with regard to attacks. The proposed model is built using the sparse autoencoder mechanism, which is an effective learning algorithm for reconstructing a new feature representation in an unsupervised manner. After the pre-training stage, the new features are fed into the SVM algorithm to improve its detection capability for intrusion and classification accuracy. Moreover, the efficiency of the approach in binary and multiclass classification is studied and compared with that of shallow classification methods, such as J48, naive Bayesian, random forest, and SVM. Results show that our approach has accelerated SVM training and testing times and performed better than most of the previous approaches in terms of performance metrics in binary and multiclass classification. The proposed STL-IDS approach improves network intrusion detection and provides a new research method for intrusion detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., & He, X. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2762418 · Cited by 2,100
Cited by
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Deep Learning Models for Cyber Security in IoT Networks
Roopak, M., Yun Tian, G., & Chambers, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc.2019.8666588 · Cited by 361
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in CyberSecurity: A Survey
Capuano, N., Fenza, G., Loia, V., & Stanzione, C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204171 · Cited by 330
An Unsupervised Deep Learning Model for Early Network Traffic Anomaly Detection
Hwang, R.-H., Peng, M.-C., Huang, C.-W., Lin, P.-C., & Nguyen, V.-L. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2973023 · Cited by 282
Azam, Z., Islam, M. M., & Huda, M. N. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3296444 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Qatf, M., Lasheng, Y., Al-Habib, M., & Al-Sabahi, K.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 52843-52856
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890474333
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Learning Approach Combining Sparse Autoencoder With SVM for Network Intrusion Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2869577
- The paper
- Al-Qatf, M., Lasheng, Y., Al-Habib, M., & Al-Sabahi, K. (2018). Deep Learning Approach Combining Sparse Autoencoder With SVM for Network Intrusion Detection. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2869577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.