A New 1D Chaotic Map and $\beta$ -Hill Climbing for Generating Substitution-Boxes
Open accessAbstract
One-dimensional (1-D) chaotic maps have been considered as prominent pseudo-random source for the design of different cryptographic primitives. They have the advantages of simplicity, easy to implement, and low computation. This paper proposes a new 1-D discrete-chaotic map which holds better dynamical behavior, lyapunov exponent, bifurcation, and larger chaotic range compared with the chaotic logistic map. We propose a method to construct cryptographically efficient substitution-boxes (S-boxes) using an improved chaotic map and β-hill climbing search technique. S-boxes are used in block ciphers as nonlinear components to bring strong confusion and security. Constructing optimal S-boxes has been a prominent topic of interest for security experts. To begin, the anticipated method generates initial S-box using the improved chaotic map. Then, β-hill climbing search is applied to obtain notable configuration of S-box that optimally satisfies the fitness function. The simulation results are compared with some recent S-boxes approaches to demonstrate that the proposed approach is more proficient in generating strong nonlinear component of block encryption systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nonlinearity score of 114 achieved for the 8×8 S-box by the proposed method is the highest among all available 8×8 S-boxes in the literature, including [40], [42], [61], [67], [69], and [77]-[80].
“Moreover, another merit of our method is that the nonlinearity score of 114 is achieved for 8 8 S-box using the proposed method which is highest among all available 8 8 S-boxes in literature including [40], [42], [61], [67], [69], [77] [80].”
From Bijective S-Boxes Method Using Improved Chaotic Map-Based Heuristic Search and Algebraic Group Structures (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 65 · Cited by 108
- Authors
- Alzaidi, A. A., Ahmad, M., Doja, M. N., Solami, E. A., & Beg, M. M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Jeddah (SA)
- Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
- Aligarh Muslim University (IN)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 55405-55418
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2895283602
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
- Keywords
- one-dimensional chaotic maps, discrete chaotic maps, substitution boxes, S-box design, block cipher, pseudorandom number generation, Lyapunov exponents, bifurcation, chaotic logistic map
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review