Distributed Abnormal Behavior Detection Approach Based on Deep Belief Network and Ensemble SVM Using Spark
Open accessAbstract
The emergence of Internet connectivity has led to a significant increase in the volume and complexity of cyber attacks. Abnormal behavior detection systems are valuable tools for ensuring the security in computer networks. However, due to the huge amount and ever increasing diversity of the intrusions, the existing intrusion detection systems, which use machine learning techniques to learn a classifier based on a handcrafted feature vector, are not robust enough to detect sophisticated attacks which cause a high false alarm rate. Therefore, building a flexible in-depth defense system to detect abnormal behavior requires an ability to automatically learn powerful features and analyze large amounts of network traffic. To address these concerns, this paper proposes a novel distributed approach for the detection of abnormal behavior in largescale networks. The developed model discovers the abnormal behavior from large-scale network traffic data using a combination of a deep feature extraction and multi-layer ensemble support vector machines (SVMs) in a distributed way. First, we perform a non-linear dimensionality reduction, achieved through a distributed deep belief networks on large-scale network traffic data. Then, the obtained features are fed to the multi-layer ensemble SVM. The construction of the ensemble is accomplished through the iterative reduce paradigm based on Spark. Empirical results show a promising gain in performance compared with other existing models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any deviation from typical behaviour is considered an anomaly and will be detected as an attack.
“Any deviation from this typical behaviour is considered an anomaly and will be detected as an attack [180] [153].”
From Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection Systems and Machine Learning Based Model Analysis through Decision Tree (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 184
- Authors
- Marir, N., Wang, H., Feng, G., Li, B., & Jia, M.
- Affiliations
- Harbin Engineering University (CN)
- Daqing Normal University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 59657-59671
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896412072
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61502118, 61872104)
- Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (F2016028)
- Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities in China (HEUCF180602, HEUCFM180604)
- National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX03001023-005)
- Natural Science Foundation of Daqing Normal University (17ZR04)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- abnormal behavior detection, intrusion detection, deep belief network, support vector machine ensemble, distributed learning, Spark, network traffic analysis, deep feature extraction, nonlinear dimensionality reduction, false alarm reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review