Cited by 184Network Security and Intrusion DetectionNetwork Packet Processing and OptimizationInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Distributed Abnormal Behavior Detection Approach Based on Deep Belief Network and Ensemble SVM Using Spark

Open access
Marir, Naila, Wang, Huiqiang, Feng, Guangsheng, Li, Bingyang, Jia, Meijuan·2018·IEEE Access

Abstract

The emergence of Internet connectivity has led to a significant increase in the volume and complexity of cyber attacks. Abnormal behavior detection systems are valuable tools for ensuring the security in computer networks. However, due to the huge amount and ever increasing diversity of the intrusions, the existing intrusion detection systems, which use machine learning techniques to learn a classifier based on a handcrafted feature vector, are not robust enough to detect sophisticated attacks which cause a high false alarm rate. Therefore, building a flexible in-depth defense system to detect abnormal behavior requires an ability to automatically learn powerful features and analyze large amounts of network traffic. To address these concerns, this paper proposes a novel distributed approach for the detection of abnormal behavior in largescale networks. The developed model discovers the abnormal behavior from large-scale network traffic data using a combination of a deep feature extraction and multi-layer ensemble support vector machines (SVMs) in a distributed way. First, we perform a non-linear dimensionality reduction, achieved through a distributed deep belief networks on large-scale network traffic data. Then, the obtained features are fed to the multi-layer ensemble SVM. The construction of the ensemble is accomplished through the iterative reduce paradigm based on Spark. Empirical results show a promising gain in performance compared with other existing models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2875045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 184

Authors
Marir, N., Wang, H., Feng, G., Li, B., & Jia, M.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Engineering University (CN)
  • Daqing Normal University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2018
Volume
6
Pages
59657-59671
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896412072
Cited by
184
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61502118, 61872104)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (F2016028)
  • Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities in China (HEUCF180602, HEUCFM180604)
  • National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX03001023-005)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Daqing Normal University (17ZR04)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
abnormal behavior detection, intrusion detection, deep belief network, support vector machine ensemble, distributed learning, Spark, network traffic analysis, deep feature extraction, nonlinear dimensionality reduction, false alarm reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review