Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imbalanced Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearing Based on Generative Adversarial Network: A Comparative Study

Open access
Mao, Wentao, Liu, Yamin, Ding, Ling, Li, Yuan·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Due to the real working conditions and data acquisition equipment, the collected working data of bearings are actually limited. Meanwhile, as the rolling bearing works in the normal state at most times, it is easy to raise the imbalance problem of fault types which restricts the diagnosis accuracy and stability. To solve these problems, we present an imbalanced fault diagnosis method based on the generative adversarial network (GAN) and provide a comparative study in detail. The key idea is utilizing GAN, a kind of deep learning technique, to generate synthetic samples for minority fault class and then improve the generalization ability of the fault diagnosis model. First, this method applies fast Fourier transform to pre-process the original vibration signal and then obtains the frequency spectrum of fault samples. Second, it uses the spectrum data as the input of GAN to generate the synthetic minority samples following the data distribution of the real samples. Finally, it puts the synthetic samples into the training set and builds a stacked denoising auto encoder model for fault diagnosis. To testify the effectiveness of the proposed method, a series of comparative experiments is carried out on the CWRU bearing dataset. The results show that the proposed method can provide a better solution for imbalanced fault diagnosis on the basis of generating similar fault samples. As a comparative study, the proposed method is compared to several diagnostic methods with traditional time-frequency domain characteristics. Moreover, we also demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms three widely used sample synthesis techniques, such as random oversampling, synthetic minority oversampling technique, and the principal curve-based oversampling method in terms of diagnosis accuracy and numerical stability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2018.2890693

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Metadata

Authors
Mao, W., Liu, Y., Ding, L., & Li, Y.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
9515-9530
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908062660
Cited by
253
References
24
FWCI
19.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imbalanced Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearing Based on Generative Adversarial Network: A Comparative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2018.2890693
The paper
Mao, W., Liu, Y., Ding, L., & Li, Y. (2019). Imbalanced Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearing Based on Generative Adversarial Network: A Comparative Study. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2890693

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.