The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Novel Combined Prediction Scheme Based on CNN and LSTM for Urban PM2.5 Concentration
Open accessAbstract
Urban air pollutant concentration prediction is dealing with a surge of massive environmental monitoring data and complex changes in air pollutants. This requires effective prediction methods to improve prediction accuracy and to prevent serious pollution incidents, thereby enhancing environmental management decision-making capacity. In this paper, a new pollutant concentration prediction method is proposed based on the vast amounts of environmental data and deep learning techniques. The proposed method integrates big data by using two kinds of deep networks. This method is based on the design that uses a convolutional neural network as the base layer, automatically extracting features of input data. A long short-term memory network is used for the output layer to consider the time dependence of pollutants. Our model consists of these two deep networks. With performance optimization, the model can predict future particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations as a time series. Finally, the prediction results are compared with the results of numerical models. The applicability and advantages of the model are also analyzed. The experimental results show that it improves prediction performance compared with classic models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Deep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing · doi:10.1561/2000000039 · Cited by 3,480
Cited by
Zamani Joharestani, M., Cao, C., Ni, X., Bashir, B., & Talebiesfandarani, S. (2019) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos10070373 · Cited by 538
A review of artificial neural network models for ambient air pollution prediction
Cabaneros, S. M., Calautit, J. K., & Hughes, B. R. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.014 · Cited by 459
Combining FastText and Glove Word Embedding for Offensive and Hate speech Text Detection
Badri, N., Kboubi, F., & Chaibi, A. H. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.132 · Cited by 65
Optimising Deep Learning at the Edge for Accurate Hourly Air Quality Prediction
Wardana, I. N. K., Gardner, J. W., & Fahmy, S. A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041064 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, D., Yu, J., Zou, G., Yong, R., Zhao, Q., & Zhang, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 20050-20059
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912731314
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel Combined Prediction Scheme Based on CNN and LSTM for Urban PM2.5 Concentration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2897028
- The paper
- Qin, D., Yu, J., Zou, G., Yong, R., Zhao, Q., & Zhang, B. (2019). A Novel Combined Prediction Scheme Based on CNN and LSTM for Urban PM2.5 Concentration. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2897028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.