The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust Intelligent Malware Detection Using Deep Learning
Open accessAbstract
Security breaches due to attacks by malicious software (malware) continue to escalate posing a major security concern in this digital age. With many computer users, corporations, and governments affected due to an exponential growth in malware attacks, malware detection continues to be a hot research topic. Current malware detection solutions that adopt the static and dynamic analysis of malware signatures and behavior patterns are time consuming and have proven to be ineffective in identifying unknown malwares in real-time. Recent malwares use polymorphic, metamorphic, and other evasive techniques to change the malware behaviors quickly and to generate a large number of new malwares. Such new malwares are predominantly variants of existing malwares, and machine learning algorithms (MLAs) are being employed recently to conduct an effective malware analysis. However, such approaches are time consuming as they require extensive feature engineering, feature learning, and feature representation. By using the advanced MLAs such as deep learning, the feature engineering phase can be completely avoided. Recently reported research studies in this direction show the performance of their algorithms with a biased training data, which limits their practical use in real-time situations. There is a compelling need to mitigate bias and evaluate these methods independently in order to arrive at a new enhanced method for effective zero-day malware detection. To fill the gap in the literature, this paper, first, evaluates the classical MLAs and deep learning architectures for malware detection, classification, and categorization using different public and private datasets. Second, we remove all the dataset bias removed in the experimental analysis by having different splits of the public and private datasets to train and test the model in a disjoint way using different timescales. Third, our major contribution is in proposing a novel image processing technique with optimal parameters for MLAs and deep learning architectures to arrive at an effective zero-day malware detection model. A comprehensive comparative study of our model demonstrates that our proposed deep learning architectures outperform classical MLAs. Our novelty in combining visualization and deep learning architectures for static, dynamic, and image processing-based hybrid approach applied in a big data environment is the first of its kind toward achieving robust intelligent zero-day malware detection. Overall, this paper paves way for an effective visual detection of malware using a scalable and hybrid deep learning framework for real-time deployments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Enhanced Network Anomaly Detection Based on Deep Neural Networks
Naseer, S., Saleem, Y., Khalid, S., Bashir, M. K., Han, J., Iqbal, M. M., & Han, K. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2863036 · Cited by 507
Cited by
IMCFN: Image-based malware classification using fine-tuned convolutional neural network architecture
Vasan, D., Alazab, M., Wassan, S., Naeem, H., Safaei, B., & Zheng, Q. (2020) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107138 · Cited by 513
Self-citationExplainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research
Zhang, Z., Hamadi, H. A., Damiani, E., Yeun, C. Y., & Taher, F. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204051 · Cited by 450
A Multidirectional LSTM Model for Predicting the Stability of a Smart Grid
Alazab, M., Khan, S., Krishnan, S. S. R., Pham, Q.-V., Reddy, M. P. K., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2991067 · Cited by 259
Self-citationIoMT malware detection approaches: analysis and research challenges
Wazid, M., Das, A. K., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Shetty, S., & Park, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2960412 · Cited by 200
Cyber threat detection based on artificial neural networks using event profiles
Lee, J., Kim, J., Kim, I., & Han, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2953095 · Cited by 188
“The well-known recurrent structures are RNN and LSTM [32], [33].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Vinayakumar, R., Alazab, M., Soman, K. P., Poornachandran, P., & Venkatraman, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 46717-46738
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2931858311
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust Intelligent Malware Detection Using Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2906934
- The paper
- Vinayakumar, R., Alazab, M., Soman, K. P., Poornachandran, P., & Venkatraman, S. (2019). Robust Intelligent Malware Detection Using Deep Learning. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2906934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.