Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Optimized Method for Segmentation and Classification of Apple Diseases Based on Strong Correlation and Genetic Algorithm Based Feature Selection

Open access
Khan, Muhammad Attique, Lali, M Ikram Ullah, Sharif, Muhammad, Javed, Kashif, Aurangzeb, Khursheed, Haider, Syed Irtaza, Altamrah, Abdulaziz Saud, Akram, Talha·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Agriculture is a major part of the world economy as it provides food safety. However, in recent years, it has been noted that plants are extensively infected by different diseases. This causes enormous economic losses in agriculture industry around the world. The manual inspection of fruit diseases is a difficult process which can be minimized by using automated methods for detection of plant diseases at the earlier stage. In this paper, a new method is implemented for apple diseases identification and recognition. Three pipeline procedures are followed by preprocessing, spot segmentation, and features extraction, and classification. In the first step, the apple leaf spots are enhanced by a hybrid method which is the conjunction of 3D box filtering, de-correlation, 3D-Gaussian filter, and 3D-median filter. After that, the lesion spots are segmented by the strong correlation-based method and optimized their results by fusion of expectation maximization (EM) segmentation. Finally, the color, color histogram, and local binary pattern (LBP) features are fused by comparison-based parallel fusion. The extracted features are optimized by genetic algorithm and classified by One-vs-All M-SVM. The experimental results are performed on plant village dataset. The proposed methodology is tested for four types of apple disease classes including healthy leaves, Blackrot, Rust, and Scab. The classification accuracy shows the improvement of our method on selected apple diseases. Moreover, the good preprocessing step always produced prominent features which later achieved significant classification accuracy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2908040

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Khan, M. A., Lali, M. I. U., Sharif, M., Javed, K., Aurangzeb, K., Haider, S. I., Altamrah, A. S., & Akram, T.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
46261-46277
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2934580386
Cited by
201
References
1
FWCI
18.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Optimized Method for Segmentation and Classification of Apple Diseases Based on Strong Correlation and Genetic Algorithm Based Feature Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2908040
The paper
Khan, M. A., Lali, M. I. U., Sharif, M., Javed, K., Aurangzeb, K., Haider, S. I., Altamrah, A. S., & Akram, T. (2019). An Optimized Method for Segmentation and Classification of Apple Diseases Based on Strong Correlation and Genetic Algorithm Based Feature Selection. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2908040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.