Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 301 of the 301 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Going Deep in Medical Image Analysis: Concepts, Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions

Open access
Altaf, Fouzia, Islam, Syed M. S., Akhtar, Naveed, Janjua, Naeem Khalid·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Medical image analysis is currently experiencing a paradigm shift due to deep learning. This technology has recently attracted so much interest of the Medical Imaging Community that it led to a specialized conference in “Medical Imaging with Deep Learning” in the year 2018. This paper surveys the recent developments in this direction and provides a critical review of the related major aspects. We organize the reviewed literature according to the underlying pattern recognition tasks and further sub-categorize it following a taxonomy based on human anatomy. This paper does not assume prior knowledge of deep learning and makes a significant contribution in explaining the core deep learning concepts to the non-experts in the Medical Community. This paper provides a unique computer vision/machine learning perspective taken on the advances of deep learning in medical imaging. This enables us to single out “lack of appropriately annotated large-scale data sets” as the core challenge (among other challenges) in this research direction. We draw on the insights from the sister research fields of computer vision, pattern recognition, and machine learning, where the techniques of dealing with such challenges have already matured, to provide promising directions for the Medical Imaging Community to fully harness deep learning in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2929365

Cites

301 of 301 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 301 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. sobel, 1968, A $3\times3$ isotropic gradient operator for image processing, Proc Talk Stanford Artif Project, 271
  2. tanner, 2018, Generative adversarial networks for MR-CT deformable image registration, arXiv 1807 07349
  3. gutman, 2016, Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC), arXiv 1605 01397
  4. 10.1118/1.597891 · doi:10.1118/1.597891
  5. combalia, 2018, Monte-carlo sampling applied to multiple instance learning for whole slide image classification, Proc 1st Conf Med Imag Deep Learn (MIDL), 1
  6. sabour, 2017, Dynamic routing between capsules, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 3856
  7. roth, 2018, Deep learning and its application to medical image segmentation, Med Imag Technol, 36, 63
  8. al-rfou, 2016, Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions, arXiv 1605 02688
  9. chollet, 2015, Keras
  10. heinrich, 2018, OBELISK—One kernel to solve nearly everything: Unified 3D binary convolutions for image analysis, Proc 1st Conf Med Imag Deep Learn (MIDL)
  11. schalkoff, 1997, Artificial Neural Networks, 1
  12. yi, 2018, Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review, arXiv 1809 07294
  13. kazeminia, 2018, GANs for medical image analysis, arXiv 1809 06222
  14. goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial nets, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 2672
  15. 2018, FDA permits marketing of artificial intelligence-based device to detect certain diabetes-related eye problems
  16. 10.1007/978-3-319-68127-6_7 · DOI
  17. makhzani, 2015, Adversarial autoencoders, arXiv 1511 05644
  18. alaverdyan, 2018, Regularized siamese neural network for unsupervised outlier detection on brain multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Application to epilepsy lesion screening, Proc 1st Conf Med Imag Deep Learn (MIDL)
  19. zhang, 2018, Automatic deep learning-based normalization of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images, arXiv 1807 02152
  20. radau, 2009, Evaluation framework for algorithms segmenting short axis cardiac MRI, The MIDAS Journal - Cardiac MR Left Ventricle Segmentation Challenge, 49, 1
  21. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.11.024 · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.11.024
  22. rajpurkar, 2017, MURA: Large dataset for abnormality detection in musculoskeletal radiographs, arXiv 1712 06957
  23. 10.1117/12.274179 · doi:10.1117/12.274179
  24. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.06.011 · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.06.011
  25. elmasry, 2012, Graph partitioning based automatic segmentation approach for CT scan liver images, Proc Federated Conf Comput Sci Inf Syst (FedCSIS), 183

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Altaf, F., Islam, S. M. S., Akhtar, N., & Janjua, N. K.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
99540-99572
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911798429
Cited by
286
References
301
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Going Deep in Medical Image Analysis: Concepts, Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2929365
The paper
Altaf, F., Islam, S. M. S., Akhtar, N., & Janjua, N. K. (2019). Going Deep in Medical Image Analysis: Concepts, Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2929365

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.