Cited by 395UAV Applications and OptimizationSatellite Communication SystemsAerospace and Aviation Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comprehensive Survey on UAV Communication Channel Modeling

Open access

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have stroke great interested both by the academic community and the industrial community due to their diverse military applications and civilian applications. Furthermore, UAVs are also envisioned to be part of future airspace traffic. The application functions delivery relies on information exchange among UAVs as well as between UAVs and ground stations (GSs), which further closely depends on aeronautical channels. However, there is a paucity of comprehensive surveys on aeronautical channel modeling in line with the specific aeronautical characteristics and scenarios. To fill this gap, this paper focuses on reviewing the air-to-ground (A2G), ground-to-ground (G2G), and air-to-air (A2A) channel measurements and modeling for UAV communications and aeronautical communications under various scenarios. We also provide the design guideline for managing the link budget of UAV communications taking account of link losses and channel fading effects. Moreover, we also analyze the receive/transmit diversity gain and spatial multiplexing gain achieved by multiple-antenna-aided UAV communications. Finally, we discuss the remaining challenge and open issues for the future development of UAV communication channel modeling.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2933173

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A2A channels exhibit a large Doppler shift due to high UAV speeds, short coherence time and intercarrier interference.

    “A2A channels are characterized to exhibit a large Doppler shift as a result of high UAV speeds, short coherence time and intercarrier interference (ICI) [116].”
  • UAV communication applications require various communication links, broadly classified into air-to-ground (A2G) and air-to-air (A2A) communications.

    “Such applications require various communication links, which can broadly be classified into two categories: 1) airto-ground (A2G) communications and 2) air-to-air (A2A) communications [116].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 149

  1. parsons, 2000, The Mobile Radio Propagation Channel
  2. 2015, Propagation Data and Prediction Methods Required for the Design of Terrestrial Line-of-Sight Systems
  3. 10.1109/MILCOM.1997.648741 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TAP.2010.2050440 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/APS.2016.7696604 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/AERO.2016.7500739 · DOI
  7. 2005, Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods
  8. medina-pazmiño, 2016, Analysis and determination of minimum requirements for a data link communication system for unmanned aerial vehicles—UAV’s, IEEE Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM), 1
  9. 10.1109/DASC.2006.313768 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/COMST.2019.2915069 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/COMST.2018.2856587 · DOI
  12. 2009, Interaction Channel for Satellite Distribution Systems Guidelines for the use of EN 301 790 in Mobile Scenarios
  13. 10.1109/TVT.2016.2530306 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TVT.2017.2659651 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TVT.2016.2585504 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10846-009-9334-x · DOI
  17. 10.1109/AERO.2012.6187152 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2828110 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.12.004 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897431 · DOI
  21. 10.2514/6.2004-6321 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TAES.2004.1292142 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2914337 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/JSAC.2018.2864416 · DOI
  25. 2015, Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap
  26. 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2537208 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2189788 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/MWC.2017.1600275 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2637926 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2018.8644370 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920103 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/TII.2018.2794320 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/TAP.2012.2196936 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/25.182598 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/ICC.2010.5502663 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/TAP.2013.2268242 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/TVT.2007.912335 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/TVT.2007.912334 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2904661 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/ett.928 · DOI
  41. 10.1017/CBO9780511807213 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.2174/1872212110666160712230039 · DOI
  43. 10.1109/JSYST.2017.2777866 · DOI
  44. 10.1109/COMST.2018.2841996 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1007/s41650-018-0037-y · DOI
  46. rice, 2000, narrowband channel model for aeronautical telemetry, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 36, 1371, 10.1109/7.892684 · DOI
  47. 10.1109/TCOM.1973.1091704 · DOI
  48. 2009, Characteristics of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Spectrum Requirements to Support Their Safe Operation in Non-Segregated Airspace
  49. rappaport, 1996, Wireless Communications Principles and Practice
  50. 10.1109/PIMRC.2013.6666143 · DOI
  51. 2004, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) Deployment Aspects
  52. 10.1109/SURV.2013.111313.00138 · DOI
  53. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909530 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1002/9780470825631 · DOI
  55. 10.1109/JSAC.2017.2687278 · DOI
  56. 10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2309936 · DOI
  57. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876700 · DOI
  58. 10.1109/TWC.2017.2782690 · DOI
  59. 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2017.8269204 · DOI
  60. cai, 2019, Low altitude air-to-ground channel characterization in LTE network, Proc of the European Conf on Antennas and Propag (EuCAP), 1
  61. 10.1109/WCNC.2018.8377104 · DOI
  62. 10.1109/TVT.2018.2886961 · DOI
  63. 10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2869596 · DOI
  64. 10.1109/LWC.2017.2755643 · DOI
  65. 10.1109/TVT.2011.2136364 · DOI
  66. 10.1109/JSAC.2018.2864417 · DOI
  67. 10.1109/TAES.2007.357132 · DOI
  68. 10.1155/2017/1587412 · DOI
  69. 10.1109/TAES.2009.5089553 · DOI
  70. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2920533 · DOI
  71. 10.1109/TVT.2017.2766784 · DOI
  72. 10.1109/TVT.2018.2890640 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.phycom.2019.100724 · DOI
  74. 10.1109/ICUAS.2017.7991486 · DOI
  75. 10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2876426 · DOI
  76. 10.1109/TVT.2018.2842126 · DOI
  77. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2887086 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2535132 · DOI
  79. 10.1017/CBO9780511841224 · DOI
  80. 10.1109/MWC.2019.1800458 · DOI
  81. 10.1109/TAP.2008.919209 · DOI
  82. 10.1109/TAP.2013.2256098 · DOI
  83. 10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7037248 · DOI
  84. 10.1109/LRA.2019.2903850 · DOI
  85. 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2612119 · DOI
  86. chu, 2018, Channel modeling for low-altitude UAV in suburban environments based on ray tracer, Proc of the European Conf on Antennas and Propag (EuCAP), 1
  87. 10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8254452 · DOI
  88. 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2018.8644381 · DOI
  89. 10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473880 · DOI
  90. 10.1109/TVT.2018.2824403 · DOI
  91. 10.1109/COMST.2016.2560343 · DOI
  92. 10.1109/LWC.2017.2710045 · DOI
  93. 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569308 · DOI
  94. 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2743715 · DOI
  95. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885594 · DOI
  96. 10.1109/TVT.2019.2916992 · DOI
  97. 10.1109/COMST.2015.2495297 · DOI
  98. 10.1109/TVT.2015.2419738 · DOI
  99. xu, 0, Adaptive coherent/non-coherent spatial modulation aided unmanned aircraft systems, IEEE Wireless Commun
  100. 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2010.5700251 · DOI
  101. 10.1109/WiMOB.2016.7763204 · DOI
  102. 10.1109/TAP.2013.2280874 · DOI
  103. kunisch, 2011, Wideband time-variant air-to-ground radio channel measurements at 5 GHz, Proc 5th Eur Conf Antennas Propag (EUCAP), 1386
  104. newhall, 2003, Wideband air-to-ground radio channel measurements using an antenna array at 2 GHz for low-altitude operations, Proc IEEE Mil Commun Conf (MILCOM), 1422
  105. 10.1016/j.aeue.2011.04.006 · DOI
  106. 10.1109/MILCOM.2002.1180518 · DOI
  107. 10.1109/TVT.2017.2677884 · DOI
  108. 10.1109/MILCOM.2011.6127710 · DOI
  109. 10.1109/IITA-GRS.2010.5602649 · DOI
  110. 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2011.6162389 · DOI
  111. jia, 2018, 3D geometry-based UAV-MIMO channel modeling and simulation, China Commun, 15, 64
  112. williams, 2009, Multipath mitigation for aeronautical telemetry with multiple antennas, Proc Int Telemetering Conf, 1
  113. 10.1109/MILCOM.2005.1605902 · DOI
  114. 2017, Telemetry Standards
  115. zhu, 2018, A novel 3D non-stationary UAV-MIMO channel model and its statistical properties, China Commun, 15, 147
  116. chen, 2018, Channel modeling and performance analysis for UAV relay systems, China Commun, 15, 89
  117. 10.1109/WCNC.2017.7925794 · DOI
  118. yin, 2016, Propagation channel characterization parameter estimation and modeling for wireless communications
  119. namuduri, 2018, UAV Networks and Communications
  120. 10.1109/MVT.2016.2645481 · DOI
  121. atkins, 2016, Unmanned Aircraft Systems UAVS Design Development and Deployment
  122. 10.1109/MILCOM.2009.5379771 · DOI
  123. 10.1109/MIM.2004.1337910 · DOI
  124. 10.1109/JPROC.2019.2909694 · DOI
  125. 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2354453 · DOI
  126. 10.1109/TCOM.1973.1091707 · DOI
  127. 10.1109/GLOCOMW.2015.7414180 · DOI
  128. 10.1109/MILCOM.2011.6127578 · DOI
  129. 10.1109/25.994803 · DOI
  130. 10.1002/dac.1212 · DOI
  131. 10.1109/JSAC.2012.120602 · DOI
  132. 10.1109/MVT.2015.2411191 · DOI
  133. holter, 2010, On the use of MIMO in aeronautical communications, ENRI Int Workshop on ATM/CNS, 1
  134. 10.1109/MWC.2013.6704473 · DOI
  135. wu, 2005, Performance evaluation of OFDM transmission in UAV wireless communication, Proc 37th Southeastern Symp System Theory, 6
  136. 10.1109/ICC.2000.853154 · DOI
  137. 10.1109/TAES.2015.140289 · DOI
  138. gao, 2013, Analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle MIMO channel capacity based on aircraft attitude, WSEAS Trans Inf Sci Appl, 10, 58
  139. 10.1109/EuCAP.2014.6902475 · DOI
  140. 10.1109/TCOMM.2005.851578 · DOI
  141. 10.1109/LAWP.2013.2293111 · DOI
  142. 10.1109/8.55574 · DOI
  143. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2875493 · DOI
  144. 10.1109/TVT.2018.2791859 · DOI
  145. 10.1109/TWC.2017.2777985 · DOI
  146. lee, 2011, Analysis of ducting effects on air-to-ground propagation channel over sea surface at C-band, Proc Asia–Pacific Microw Conf Proc (APMC), 1678
  147. 10.1109/ICACCI.2015.7275586 · DOI
  148. lee, 2012, Empirical modeling of ducting effects on a mobile microwave link over a sea surface, Radio Eng, 21, 1054
  149. heemskerk, 1993, The influence of evaporation duct on the propagation of electromagnetic waves low above the sea surface at 3–94 GHz, Proc 8th Int Conf Antennas Propag, 348

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yan, C., Fu, L., Zhang, J., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
107769-107792
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965660127
Cited by
395
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 4
FWCI
34.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2018YFC1407200, 2017YFC1405200)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Keywords
UAV communication, air-to-ground channel, channel measurement, link budget, fading channels, diversity gain, spatial multiplexing gain, multiple antennas, UAV swarms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review