The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Privacy-Preserving and Identity-Based Personalized Recommendation Scheme for Encrypted Tasks in Crowdsourcing
Open accessAbstract
Personalized task recommendation can guarantee that tasks are pushed to the right workers, and thus, requesters gain better-quality output from a crowdsourcing system. Requesters' tasks and workers' interests exposed to the remote crowdsourcing platform in the form of plaintext have raised serious privacy concerns. Encrypting tasks and interests is a feasible solution to protect the privacy of both the requesters and the workers. However, data encryption renders the existing crowdsourcing task recommendation techniques ineffective. To address this challenge, in this study, we transform the personalized task recommendation problem into a task access control and keyword-based search problem for encrypted tasks. On the basis of this idea, we first develop a new technique called multi-authority attribute-based searchable encryption by equipping the searchable capacity for Lewko and Waters's multi-authority attribute -based encryption. Then, we utilize the new technique to construct a secure and personalized recommendation scheme in crowdsourcing, which achieves accurate personalized task recommendation in a privacy-preserving manner by a seamless combination of attribute-based encryption and searchable encryption. We provide rigorous security proof and thorough security analysis for the proposed scheme. Extensive experiments demonstrate the correctness and practicality of the proposed scheme.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Among them, CP-ABE is extensively used in PPRS with other encryption techniques such as search encryption or secret sharing due to the continuous information exchange nature of RS to acquire necessary services [154-156].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [155]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2889754 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878268 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-00843-6_1 · DOI
- 10.1145/1315245.1315302 · DOI
- 10.1109/SP.2007.11 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1315245.1315270 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0203225 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0205675 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2846037 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0197318 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSC.2018.2791601 · DOI
- 10.1145/1837885.1837889 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2830784 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.09.007 · DOI
- 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2877780 · DOI
- ambati, 2011, Towards task recommendation in micro-task markets, Proc AAAI, 1
- 10.1145/2488388.2488421 · DOI
- sahai, 2005, Fuzzy identity-based encryption, Proc EUROCRYPT, 457
- goh, 2003, Secure Indexes IACR ePrint Cryptography Archive
- 10.1007/11496137_30 · DOI
- 10.1145/1180405.1180417 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-70936-7_29 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1007/11602897_35 · DOI
- 10.1145/2442657.2442661 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-14992-4_13 · DOI
- 10.1145/1180405.1180418 · DOI
- 10.1109/MIC.2012.14 · DOI
- song, 2000, Practical techniques for searches on encrypted data, Proc IEEE Symp Secur Privacy, 44
- 10.1109/GLOCOM.2016.7842254 · DOI
- 10.1145/1924421.1924442 · DOI
- 10.1109/TDSC.2018.2875682 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_31 · DOI
- 10.1201/9781420010756 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2382196.2382298 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_9 · DOI
- bost, 2016, $\Sigma\text{o}\varphi\text{o}\varsigma$ : Forward secure searchable encryption, Proc ACM CCS, 1143
- 10.14722/ndss.2014.23298 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICWS.2016.10 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-32946-3_21 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-34481-7_63 · DOI
- 10.1145/3133956.3133970 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2015.2414399 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-24852-1_3 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7180511 · DOI
- boneh, 2004, Public key encryption with keyword search, Proc EUROCRYPT, 506
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Yin, H., Xiong, Y., Deng, T., Deng, H., & Zhu, P.
- Affiliations
- Changsha University (CN)
- Hunan University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 138857-138871
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2977212494
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972058, 61902123)
- Science and Technology Key Projects of Hunan Province (2016JC2012)
- Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2017JJ3371)
- Outstanding Youth Research Project of Provincial Education Department of Hunan (17B030)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
- Keywords
- crowdsourcing, privacy preservation, searchable encryption, attribute-based encryption, multi-authority attribute-based encryption, keyword search, employee interests, encrypted data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Privacy-Preserving and Identity-Based Personalized Recommendation Scheme for Encrypted Tasks in Crowdsourcing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2943114
- The paper
- Yin, H., Xiong, Y., Deng, T., Deng, H., & Zhu, P. (2019). A Privacy-Preserving and Identity-Based Personalized Recommendation Scheme for Encrypted Tasks in Crowdsourcing. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2943114