Cited by 10Cryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security SolutionsInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Privacy-Preserving and Identity-Based Personalized Recommendation Scheme for Encrypted Tasks in Crowdsourcing

Open access

Abstract

Personalized task recommendation can guarantee that tasks are pushed to the right workers, and thus, requesters gain better-quality output from a crowdsourcing system. Requesters' tasks and workers' interests exposed to the remote crowdsourcing platform in the form of plaintext have raised serious privacy concerns. Encrypting tasks and interests is a feasible solution to protect the privacy of both the requesters and the workers. However, data encryption renders the existing crowdsourcing task recommendation techniques ineffective. To address this challenge, in this study, we transform the personalized task recommendation problem into a task access control and keyword-based search problem for encrypted tasks. On the basis of this idea, we first develop a new technique called multi-authority attribute-based searchable encryption by equipping the searchable capacity for Lewko and Waters's multi-authority attribute -based encryption. Then, we utilize the new technique to construct a secure and personalized recommendation scheme in crowdsourcing, which achieves accurate personalized task recommendation in a privacy-preserving manner by a seamless combination of attribute-based encryption and searchable encryption. We provide rigorous security proof and thorough security analysis for the proposed scheme. Extensive experiments demonstrate the correctness and practicality of the proposed scheme.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2943114

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2889754 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878268 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-3-642-00843-6_1 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/1315245.1315302 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/SP.2007.11 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1145/1315245.1315270 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0203225 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0205675 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2846037 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0197318 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TSC.2018.2791601 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/1837885.1837889 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2830784 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.09.007 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2877780 · DOI
  16. ambati, 2011, Towards task recommendation in micro-task markets, Proc AAAI, 1
  17. 10.1145/2488388.2488421 · DOI
  18. sahai, 2005, Fuzzy identity-based encryption, Proc EUROCRYPT, 457
  19. goh, 2003, Secure Indexes IACR ePrint Cryptography Archive
  20. 10.1007/11496137_30 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1180405.1180417 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/978-3-540-70936-7_29 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.007 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/11602897_35 · DOI
  25. 10.1145/2442657.2442661 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-3-642-14992-4_13 · DOI
  27. 10.1145/1180405.1180418 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/MIC.2012.14 · DOI
  29. song, 2000, Practical techniques for searches on encrypted data, Proc IEEE Symp Secur Privacy, 44
  30. 10.1109/GLOCOM.2016.7842254 · DOI
  31. 10.1145/1924421.1924442 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/TDSC.2018.2875682 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_31 · DOI
  34. 10.1201/9781420010756 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1145/2382196.2382298 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_9 · DOI
  37. bost, 2016, $\Sigma\text{o}\varphi\text{o}\varsigma$ : Forward secure searchable encryption, Proc ACM CCS, 1143
  38. 10.14722/ndss.2014.23298 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/ICWS.2016.10 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/978-3-642-32946-3_21 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/978-3-642-34481-7_63 · DOI
  42. 10.1145/3133956.3133970 · DOI
  43. 10.1109/TIFS.2015.2414399 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/978-3-540-24852-1_3 · DOI
  45. 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7180511 · DOI
  46. boneh, 2004, Public key encryption with keyword search, Proc EUROCRYPT, 506

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Yin, H., Xiong, Y., Deng, T., Deng, H., & Zhu, P.
Affiliations
  • Changsha University (CN)
  • Hunan University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
138857-138871
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2977212494
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972058, 61902123)
  • Science and Technology Key Projects of Hunan Province (2016JC2012)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2017JJ3371)
  • Outstanding Youth Research Project of Provincial Education Department of Hunan (17B030)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
crowdsourcing, privacy preservation, searchable encryption, attribute-based encryption, multi-authority attribute-based encryption, keyword search, employee interests, encrypted data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Privacy-Preserving and Identity-Based Personalized Recommendation Scheme for Encrypted Tasks in Crowdsourcing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2943114
The paper
Yin, H., Xiong, Y., Deng, T., Deng, H., & Zhu, P. (2019). A Privacy-Preserving and Identity-Based Personalized Recommendation Scheme for Encrypted Tasks in Crowdsourcing. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2943114