The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comprehensive Survey for Intelligent Spam Email Detection
Open accessAbstract
The tremendously growing problem of phishing e-mail, also known as spam including spear phishing or spam borne malware, has demanded a need for reliable intelligent anti-spam e-mail filters. This survey paper describes a focused literature survey of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) methods for intelligent spam email detection, which we believe can help in developing appropriate countermeasures. In this paper, we considered 4 parts in the email's structure that can be used for intelligent analysis: (A) Headers Provide Routing Information, contain mail transfer agents (MTA) that provide information like email and IP address of each sender and recipient of where the email originated and what stopovers, and final destination. (B) The SMTP Envelope, containing mail exchangers' identification, originating source and destination domains\users. (C) First part of SMTP Data, containing information like from, to, date, subject - appearing in most email clients (D) Second part of SMTP Data, containing email body including text content, and attachment. Based on the number the relevance of an emerging intelligent method, papers representing each method were identified, read, and summarized. Insightful findings, challenges and research problems are disclosed in this paper. This comprehensive survey paves the way for future research endeavors addressing theoretical and empirical aspects related to intelligent spam email detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
An algorithm for suffix stripping
Porter, M. F. (1980) · Program · doi:10.1108/eb046814 · Cited by 8,096 · cited 2×
“The multi-neural network classifiers deal with words from the email body after the words have been pre-processed to remove the stop words (articles, prepositions) and noises (obfuscated words such as I∗n$u∗rènce or misspellings) along with the application of stemming process to extract the word root using Porter’s Alg…”
BackgroundMethodDeep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing · doi:10.1561/2000000039 · Cited by 3,480
Understanding bag-of-words model: a statistical framework
Zhang, Y., Jin, R., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2010) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-010-0001-0 · Cited by 1,384
Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Algorithms for Pattern Classification
Sathya, R., & Abraham, A. (2013) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.14569/ijarai.2013.020206 · Cited by 459
Bio-inspired computing: Algorithms review, deep analysis, and the scope of applications
Darwish, A. (2018) · Future Computing and Informatics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.fcij.2018.06.001 · Cited by 302
Discrete Bayesian Network Classifiers: A Survey
Bielza, C., & Larrañaga, P. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2576868 · Cited by 248
Cited by
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research
Zhang, Z., Hamadi, H. A., Damiani, E., Yeun, C. Y., & Taher, F. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204051 · Cited by 450
The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecurity
Apruzzese, G., Laskov, P., Montes de Oca, E., Mallouli, W., Brdalo Rapa, L., Grammatopoulos, A. V., & Di Franco, F. (2023) · Digital Threats: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3545574 · Cited by 279
A Three-Stage Machine Learning Network Security Solution for Public Entities
Saganowski, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom50675.2020.00145 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Karim, A., Azam, S., Shanmugam, B., Kannoorpatti, K., & Alazab, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 168261-168295
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991305957
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 33.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comprehensive Survey for Intelligent Spam Email Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2019.2954791
- The paper
- Karim, A., Azam, S., Shanmugam, B., Kannoorpatti, K., & Alazab, M. (2019). A Comprehensive Survey for Intelligent Spam Email Detection. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2954791
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.