Cited by 39Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCryptography and Data Security

Secure Architectures Implementing Trusted Coalitions for Blockchained Distributed Learning (TCLearn)

Open access
Lugan, Sebastien, Desbordes, Paul, Brion, Eliott, Ramos Tormo, Luis Xavier, Legay, Axel, Macq, Benoit·2019·IEEE Access

Abstract

Distributed learning across coalitions is becoming popular for multi-centric implementation of deep learning models. However, the level of trust between the members of a coalition can vary and requires different security architectures. Privacy of the training data has been largely described in distributed learning. In this paper, we present a scalable security architecture providing additional features such as validation on the sources quality, confidentiality on the model within a trusted coalition or confidentiality among untrusted partners inside the coalition. More specifically, we propose solutions that guarantee preservation not only of data privacy but also of data quality, enforce a trustworthy sequence of iterative learning, and that lead to equitable sharing of the learned model among the coalition's members. We give an example of its deployment in the case of the distributed optimization of a deep learning convolutional neural network trained on medical images.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2019.2959220

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 39

Authors
Lugan, S., Desbordes, P., Brion, E., Ramos Tormo, L. X., Legay, A., & Macq, B.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
181789-181799
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995838027
Cited by
39
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Wal-e-Cities
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • Bidmed
  • Wallonia, Belgium (RW-DGO6-Biowin-Bidmed)
  • Prother-Wal Project
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
distributed learning, blockchain, security architecture, data privacy, data quality validation, model confidentiality, federated learning, model sharing, convolutional neural networks, medical image analysis, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review