The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Realizing an Efficient IoMT-Assisted Patient Diet Recommendation System Through Machine Learning Model
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies have shown that robust diets recommended to patients by Dietician or an Artificial Intelligent automated medical diet based cloud system can increase longevity, protect against further disease, and improve the overall quality of life. However, medical personnel are yet to fully understand patient-dietician’s rationale of recommender system. This paper proposes a deep learning solution for health base medical dataset that automatically detects which food should be given to which patient base on the disease and other features like age, gender, weight, calories, protein, fat, sodium, fiber, cholesterol. This research framework is focused on implementing both machine and deep learning algorithms like, logistic regression, naive bayes, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). The medical dataset collected through the internet and hospitals consists of 30 patient’s data with 13 features of different diseases and 1000 products. Product section has 8 features set. The features of these IoMT data were analyzed and further encoded before applying deep and machine and learning-based protocols. The performance of various machine learning and deep learning techniques was carried and the result proves that LSTM technique performs better than other scheme with respect to forecasting accuracy, recall, precision, and$F1$-measures. We achieved 97.74% accuracy using LSTM deep learning model. Similarly 98% precision, 99% recall and$99\%~F1$-measure for allowed class is achieved, and for not-allowed class precision is 89%, recall score is 73% and$F1$Measure score is 80%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019 · Cited by 1,571
The use of machine learning algorithms in recommender systems: a systematic review
Portugal, I., Alencar, P., & Cowan, D. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.12.020 · Cited by 743 · cited 1×
“The same complained by authors [25], [26], who argued that medical sector still lag behind in using big data analytic.”
Background
Cited by
A Survey of Recommendation Systems: Recommendation Models, Techniques, and Application Fields
Ko, H., Lee, S., Park, Y., & Choi, A. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11010141 · Cited by 658
A Multidirectional LSTM Model for Predicting the Stability of a Smart Grid
Alazab, M., Khan, S., Krishnan, S. S. R., Pham, Q.-V., Reddy, M. P. K., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2991067 · Cited by 259
Self-citationTheodore Armand, T. P., Nfor, K. A., Kim, J.-I., & Kim, H.-C. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16071073 · Cited by 253
Rasool, R. U., Ahmad, H. F., Rafique, W., Qayyum, A., & Qadir, J. (2022) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103332 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Iwendi, C., Khan, S., Anajemba, J. H., Bashir, A. K., & Noor, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 28462-28474
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3001869580
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Realizing an Efficient IoMT-Assisted Patient Diet Recommendation System Through Machine Learning Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.2968537
- The paper
- Iwendi, C., Khan, S., Anajemba, J. H., Bashir, A. K., & Noor, F. (2020). Realizing an Efficient IoMT-Assisted Patient Diet Recommendation System Through Machine Learning Model. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2968537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.