Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Northern Maize Leaf Blight Detection Under Complex Field Environment Based on Deep Learning

Open access
Sun, Jun, Yang, Yu, He, Xiaofei, Wu, Xiaohong·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

Northern maize leaf blight is one of the major diseases that endanger the health of maize. The complex background of the field and different light intensity make the detection of diseases more difficult. A multi-scale feature fusion instance detection method, based on convolutional neural network, is proposed to detect maize leaf blight. The proposed technique incorporates three major steps of data set preprocessing part, fine-tuning network and detection module. In the first step, the improved retinex is used to process data sets, which successfully solves the problem of poor detection effects caused by high-intensity light. In the second step, the improved RPN is utilized to adjust the anchor box of diseased leaves. The improved RPN network identifies and deletes negative anchors, which reduces the search space of the classifier and provides better initial information for the detection network. In this paper, a transmission module is designed to connect the fine-tuning network with the detection module. On the one hand, the transmission module fuses the features of the low-level and high-level to improve the detection accuracy of small target diseases. On the other hand, the transmission module converts the feature map associated with the fine-tuning network to the detection module, thus realizing the feature sharing between the detection module and the fine-tuning network. In the third step, the detection module takes the optimized anchor as input, focuses on detecting the diseased leaves. By sharing the features of the transmission module, the time-consuming process of using candidate regions layer by layer to detect is eliminated. Therefore, the efficiency of the whole model has reached the efficiency of the one-stage model. In order to further optimize the detection effect of the model, we replace the loss function with generalized intersection over union (GIoU). After 60000 iterations, the highest mean average precision (mAP) reaches 91.83%. The experimental results indicate that the improved model outperforms several existing methods in terms of greater precision and frames per second (FPS).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.2973658

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Sun, J., Yang, Y., He, X., & Wu, X.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
33679-33688
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005607320
Cited by
199
References
2
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Northern Maize Leaf Blight Detection Under Complex Field Environment Based on Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.2973658
The paper
Sun, J., Yang, Y., He, X., & Wu, X. (2020). Northern Maize Leaf Blight Detection Under Complex Field Environment Based on Deep Learning. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2973658

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.