The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective Attack Detection in Internet of Medical Things Smart Environment Using a Deep Belief Neural Network
Open accessAbstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) has lately developed into an innovation for developing smart environments. Security and privacy are viewed as main problems in any technology's dependence on the IoT model. Privacy and security issues arise due to the different possible attacks caused by intruders. Thus, there is an essential need to develop an intrusion detection system for attack and anomaly identification in the IoT system. In this work, we have proposed a deep learning-based method Deep Belief Network (DBN) algorithm model for the intrusion detection system. Regarding the attacks and anomaly detection, the CICIDS 2017 dataset is utilized for the performance analysis of the present IDS model. The proposed method produced better results in all the parameters in relation to accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, and detection rate. The proposed method has achieved 99.37% accuracy for normal class, 97.93% for Botnet class, 97.71% for Brute Force class, 96.67% for Dos/DDoS class, 96.37% for Infiltration class, 97.71% for Ports can class and 98.37% for Web attack, and these results were compared with various classifiers as shown in the results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318 · cited 2×
“Benign: Normal traffic behaviour [12].”
MethodA Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Internet of Things (IoT) Security
Al-Garadi, M. A., Mohamed, A., Al-Ali, A. K., Du, X., Ali, I., & Guizani, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2988293 · Cited by 1,392
Attack and anomaly detection in IoT sensors in IoT sites using machine learning approaches
Hasan, M., Islam, M. M., Zarif, M. I. I., & Hashem, M. M. A. (2019) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2019.100059 · Cited by 841
Machine Learning in IoT Security: Current Solutions and Future Challenges
Hussain, F., Hussain, R., Hassan, S. A., & Hossain, E. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986444 · Cited by 129
Cited by
DCNNBiLSTM: An Efficient Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System
Hnamte, V., & Hussain, J. (2023) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2023.100053 · Cited by 259
Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection for Distributed Denial of Service Attack in Agriculture 4.0
Ferrag, M. A., Shu, L., Djallel, H., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10111257 · Cited by 253
Vijayakumar, K. P., Pradeep, K., Balasundaram, A., & Prusty, M. R. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11041072 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Manimurugan, S., Al-Mutairi, S., Aborokbah, M. M., Chilamkurti, N., Ganesan, S., & Patan, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 77396-77404
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015392399
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective Attack Detection in Internet of Medical Things Smart Environment Using a Deep Belief Neural Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.2986013
- The paper
- Manimurugan, S., Al-Mutairi, S., Aborokbah, M. M., Chilamkurti, N., Ganesan, S., & Patan, R. (2020). Effective Attack Detection in Internet of Medical Things Smart Environment Using a Deep Belief Neural Network. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2986013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.