Cited by 122Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression RecognitionEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Expression-EEG Based Collaborative Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using Deep AutoEncoder

Open access
Zhang, Hongli·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

Emotion recognition has shown many valuable roles in people's lives under the background of artificial intelligence technology. However, most existing emotion recognition methods have poor recognition performance, which prevents their promotion in practical applications. To alleviate this problem, we proposed an expression-EEG interaction multi-modal emotion recognition method using a deep automatic encoder. Firstly, decision tree is applied as objective feature selection method. Then, based on the facial expression features recognized by sparse representation, the solution vector coefficients are analyzed to determine the facial expression category of the test samples. After that, the bimodal deep automatic encoder is adopted to fuse the EEG signals and facial expression signals. The third layer of BDAE extracts features for training of supervised learning. Finally, LIBSVM classifier is used to complete classification task. We carried out experiments on a constructed video library to verify the proposed emotion recognition method. The results show that the proposed method can effectively extract and integrate high-level emotion-related features in EEG and facial expression signals. The recognition rate of discrete emotion state type and the average emotion recognition rate have been improved relatively, in which the average emotion recognition rate is 85.71%. Overall, the emotion recognition ability has been greatly improved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.3021994

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNNs have the ability to find robust spatial features from images.

    “Among these technologies, CNNs have the ability to nd robust spatial features from images, RNNs are suitable for extracting the temporal features of video and speech for classi cation, and AEs are more suitable for learning unsupervised features [13].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H.
Affiliations
Inner Mongolia Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Hongli
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
164130-164143
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3084140714
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15
FWCI
15.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Key Technology Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2020GG0170)
  • Natural Science Foundation Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2015MS0634)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
multimodal emotion recognition, EEG, facial expressions, deep autoencoder, feature fusion, decision tree feature selection, sparse representation, video-based emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review