Expression-EEG Based Collaborative Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using Deep AutoEncoder
Open accessAbstract
Emotion recognition has shown many valuable roles in people's lives under the background of artificial intelligence technology. However, most existing emotion recognition methods have poor recognition performance, which prevents their promotion in practical applications. To alleviate this problem, we proposed an expression-EEG interaction multi-modal emotion recognition method using a deep automatic encoder. Firstly, decision tree is applied as objective feature selection method. Then, based on the facial expression features recognized by sparse representation, the solution vector coefficients are analyzed to determine the facial expression category of the test samples. After that, the bimodal deep automatic encoder is adopted to fuse the EEG signals and facial expression signals. The third layer of BDAE extracts features for training of supervised learning. Finally, LIBSVM classifier is used to complete classification task. We carried out experiments on a constructed video library to verify the proposed emotion recognition method. The results show that the proposed method can effectively extract and integrate high-level emotion-related features in EEG and facial expression signals. The recognition rate of discrete emotion state type and the average emotion recognition rate have been improved relatively, in which the average emotion recognition rate is 85.71%. Overall, the emotion recognition ability has been greatly improved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CNNs have the ability to find robust spatial features from images.
“Among these technologies, CNNs have the ability to nd robust spatial features from images, RNNs are suitable for extracting the temporal features of video and speech for classi cation, and AEs are more suitable for learning unsupervised features [13].”
From Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using a Hierarchical Fusion Convolutional Neural Network (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal Emotion Recognition using Deep Learning
Abdullah, S. M. S. A., Ameen, S. Y. A., M. Sadeeq, M. A., & Zeebaree, S. (2021) · Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends · doi:10.38094/jastt20291 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Emotion recognition in EEG signals using deep learning methods: A review
Jafari, M., Shoeibi, A., Khodatars, M., Bagherzadeh, S., Shalbaf, A., García, D. L., Gorriz, J. M., & Acharya, U. R. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107450 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Automated emotion recognition: Current trends and future perspectives
Maithri, M., Raghavendra, U., Gudigar, A., Samanth, J., Barua, P. D., Murugappan, M., Chakole, Y., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106646 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using a Hierarchical Fusion Convolutional Neural Network
Zhang, Y., Cheng, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3049516 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Multimodal emotion recognition based on manifold learning and convolution neural network
Zhang, Y., Cheng, C., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13149-8 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Singh, P., Tripathi, M. K., Patil, M. B., Shivendra, & Neelakantappa, M. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-19171-2 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Muhammad, F., Hussain, M., & Aboalsamh, H. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13050977 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
DeepVANet: A Deep End-to-End Network for Multi-modal Emotion Recognition
Zhang, Y., Hossain, M. Z., & Rahman, S. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85613-7_16 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Moussaoui, K., & Farah, M. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP) · doi:10.1109/atsip62566.2024.10638977 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, H.
- Affiliations
- Inner Mongolia Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Hongli
- ORCID
- Zhang, Hongli
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 164130-164143
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3084140714
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15
- FWCI
- 15.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Key Technology Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2020GG0170)
- Natural Science Foundation Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2015MS0634)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- multimodal emotion recognition, EEG, facial expressions, deep autoencoder, feature fusion, decision tree feature selection, sparse representation, video-based emotion recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review