The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Recent Advances in Automated Guided Vehicle Technologies: Integration Challenges and Research Areas for 5G-Based Smart Manufacturing Applications
Open accessAbstract
In industrial environments, over several decades, Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) and Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) have served to improve efficiencies of intralogistics and material handling tasks. However, for system integrators, the choice and effective deployment of improved, suitable and reliable communication and control technologies for these unmanned vehicles remains a very challenging task. Specifics of communication for AGVs and AMRs imposes stringent performance requirements on latency and reliability of communication links which many existing wireless technologies struggle to satisfy. In this paper, a review of latest AGVs and AMRs research results in the past decade is presented. The review encompasses results from different past and present research domains of AGVs. In addition, performance requirements of communication networks in terms of their latencies and reliabilities when they are deployed for AGVs and AMRs coordination, control and fleet management in smart manufacturing environments are discussed. Integration challenges and limitations of present state-of-the-art AGV and AMR technologies when those technologies are used for facilitating AGV-based smart manufacturing and factory of the future applications are also thoroughly discussed. The paper also present a thorough discussion of areas in need of further research regarding the application of 5G networks for AGVs and AMRs fleet management in smart manufacturing environments. In addition, novel integration ideas by which tactile Internet, 5G network slicing and virtual reality applications can be used to facilitate AGV and AMR based factory of the future (FoF) and smart manufacturing applications were motivated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Fazlollahtabar, H., & Saidi-Mehrabad, M. (2015) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-013-0003-8 · Cited by 163
RetractedDigital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Mada, B., Flinck, H., Dutta, S., & Sabella, D. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2705720 · Cited by 1,775
A Survey on Low Latency Towards 5G: RAN, Core Network and Caching Solutions
Parvez, I., Rahmati, A., Guvenc, I., Sarwat, A. I., & Dai, H. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2841349 · Cited by 883
Massive machine-type communications in 5g: physical and MAC-layer solutions
Bockelmann, C., Pratas, N., Nikopour, H., Au, K., Svensson, T., Stefanovic, C., Popovski, P., & Dekorsy, A. (2016) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2016.7565189 · Cited by 748
Ultra-Low Latency (ULL) Networks: The IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet Standards and Related 5G ULL Research
Nasrallah, A., Thyagaturu, A. S., Alharbi, Z., Wang, C., Shao, X., Reisslein, M., & ElBakoury, H. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2869350 · Cited by 695
Edge computing technologies for Internet of Things: a primer
Ai, Y., Peng, M., & Zhang, K. (2018) · Digital Communications and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2017.07.001 · Cited by 582
A review of design and control of automated guided vehicle systems
Le-Anh, T., & De Koster, M. B. M. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.036 · Cited by 473
The internet of things for smart manufacturing: A review
Yang, H., Kumara, S., Bukkapatnam, S. T. S., & Tsung, F. (2019) · IISE Transactions · doi:10.1080/24725854.2018.1555383 · Cited by 449
Machine-type communications: current status and future perspectives toward 5G systems
Shariatmadari, H., Ratasuk, R., Iraji, S., Laya, A., Taleb, T., Jäntti, R., & Ghosh, A. (2015) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7263367 · Cited by 430
Cited by
Smart manufacturing powered by recent technological advancements: A review
Sahoo, S., & Lo, C.-Y. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.008 · Cited by 292
Motion Planning for Mobile Robots—Focusing on Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Systematic Review
Sun, H., Zhang, W., Yu, R., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3076530 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Oyekanlu, E. A., Smith, A. C., Thomas, W. P., Mulroy, G., Hitesh, D., Ramsey, M., Kuhn, D. J., Mcghinnis, J. D., Buonavita, S. C., Looper, N. A., Ng, M., Ng'oma, A., Liu, W., Mcbride, P. G., Shultz, M. G., Cerasi, C., & Sun, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 202312-202353
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3096574182
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 22.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Recent Advances in Automated Guided Vehicle Technologies: Integration Challenges and Research Areas for 5G-Based Smart Manufacturing Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.3035729
- The paper
- Oyekanlu, E. A., Smith, A. C., Thomas, W. P., Mulroy, G., Hitesh, D., Ramsey, M., Kuhn, D. J., Mcghinnis, J. D., Buonavita, S. C., Looper, N. A., Ng, M., Ng'oma, A., Liu, W., Mcbride, P. G., Shultz, M. G., Cerasi, C., & Sun, D. (2020). A Review of Recent Advances in Automated Guided Vehicle Technologies: Integration Challenges and Research Areas for 5G-Based Smart Manufacturing Applications. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3035729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.