The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Machine Learning for Indoor Positioning
Open accessAbstract
Widespread proliferation of wireless coverage has enabled culmination of number of advanced location-based services (LBS). Continuous tracking of accurate physical location is the foundation of these services, which is a challenging task especially indoors. Multitude of techniques and algorithms have been proposed for indoor positioning systems (IPS's). However, accuracy, reliability, scalability and, adaptability to the environment still remain as challenges for widespread deployment. Especially, unpredictable radio propagation characteristics in vastly varying indoor environments plus access technology limitations contribute to these challenges. Machine learning (ML) approaches have been widely attempted recently to overcome these challenges with reasonable success. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive survey of ML enabled localization techniques using most common wireless technologies. First, we provide a brief background on indoor localization techniques. Afterwards, we discuss various ML techniques (supervised and unsupervised) that could alleviate different challenges in indoor localization including Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) issue, device heterogeneity and environmental variations with reasonable complexity. The trade-offs among multitude of issues are discussed using numerous published results. We also discuss how the ML algorithms can be effectively used for fusing different technologies and algorithms to achieve a comprehensive IPS. In essence, this survey will serve as a reference material to acquire a detailed knowledge on recent development of machine learning for accurate indoor positioning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Survey of Wireless Indoor Positioning Techniques and Systems
Liu, H., Darabi, H., Banerjee, P., & Liu, J. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2007.905750 · Cited by 4,098
A Survey of Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
Zafari, F., Gkelias, A., & Leung, K. K. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2911558 · Cited by 2,530
LANDMARC: indoor location sensing using active RFID
Ni, L. M., Liu, Y., Lau, Y. C., & Patil, A. P. (2004) · Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2003. (PerCom 2003). · doi:10.1109/percom.2003.1192765 · Cited by 2,323
From RSSI to CSI: Indoor localization via channel response
Yang, Z., Zhou, Z., & Liu, Y. (2013) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2543581.2543592 · Cited by 1,229
SpotFi: Decimeter Level Localization Using WiFi
Kotaru, M., Joshi, K., Bharadia, D., & Katti, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication · doi:10.1145/2785956.2787487 · Cited by 1,169
CSI-based Fingerprinting for Indoor Localization: A Deep Learning Approach
Wang, X., Gao, L., Mao, S., & Pandey, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2016.2545523 · Cited by 1,106
Location Fingerprinting with Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons
Faragher, R., & Harle, R. (2015) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2015.2430281 · Cited by 879
ArrayTrack: a fine-grained indoor location system
Xiong, J., & Jamieson, K. (2013) · Cited by 821
Locating in fingerprint space: wireless indoor localization with little human intervention
Yang, Z., Wu, C., & Liu, Y. (2012) · Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/2348543.2348578 · Cited by 739
NLOS identification and mitigation for localization based on UWB experimental data
Maranò, S., Gifford, W. M., Wymeersch, H., & Win, M. Z. (2010) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2010.100907 · Cited by 700
Metadata
- Authors
- Nessa, A., Adhikari, B., Hussain, F., & Fernando, X. N.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 214945-214965
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3108914020
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Machine Learning for Indoor Positioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.3039271
- The paper
- Nessa, A., Adhikari, B., Hussain, F., & Fernando, X. N. (2020). A Survey of Machine Learning for Indoor Positioning. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3039271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.