The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine Learning Applications for Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review
Open accessAbstract
Agriculture plays a vital role in the economic growth of any country. With the increase of population, frequent changes in climatic conditions and limited resources, it becomes a challenging task to fulfil the food requirement of the present population. Precision agriculture also known as smart farming have emerged as an innovative tool to address current challenges in agricultural sustainability. The mechanism that drives this cutting edge technology is machine learning (ML). It gives the machine ability to learn without being explicitly programmed. ML together with IoT (Internet of Things) enabled farm machinery are key components of the next agriculture revolution. In this article, authors present a systematic review of ML applications in the field of agriculture. The areas that are focused are prediction of soil parameters such as organic carbon and moisture content, crop yield prediction, disease and weed detection in crops and species detection. ML with computer vision are reviewed for the classification of a different set of crop images in order to monitor the crop quality and yield assessment. This approach can be integrated for enhanced livestock production by predicting fertility patterns, diagnosing eating disorders, cattle behaviour based on ML models using data collected by collar sensors, etc. Intelligent irrigation which includes drip irrigation and intelligent harvesting techniques are also reviewed that reduces human labour to a great extent. This article demonstrates how knowledge-based agriculture can improve the sustainable productivity and quality of the product.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review
Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082674 · Cited by 3,441
Cited by
Machine learning in agriculture domain: A state-of-art survey
Meshram, V., Patil, K., Meshram, V., Hanchate, D., & Ramkteke, S. D. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ailsci.2021.100010 · Cited by 367
Condran, S., Bewong, M., Islam, M. Z., Maphosa, L., & Zheng, L. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3188649 · Cited by 99
Nancy, P., Pallathadka, H., Naved, M., Kaliyaperumal, K., Arumugam, K., & Garchar, V. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies and Applications (ICACTA) · doi:10.1109/icacta54488.2022.9753623 · Cited by 29
Park, J., Na, H. J., & Kim, H. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3519219 · Cited by 10
Liu, S., Xu, A., & Hou, Z. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18031612
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, A., Jain, A., Gupta, P., & Chowdary, V.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 4843-4873
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3120697286
- Cited by
- 1,102
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning Applications for Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.3048415
- The paper
- Sharma, A., Jain, A., Gupta, P., & Chowdary, V. (2021). Machine Learning Applications for Precision Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3048415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.