Cited by 90Gait Recognition and AnalysisUser Authentication and Security SystemsBiometric Identification and Security

Multi-Model Long Short-Term Memory Network for Gait Recognition Using Window-Based Data Segment

Open access
Tran, Lam, Hoang, Thang, Nguyen, Thuc, Kim, Hyunil, Choi, Deokjai·2021·IEEE Access

Abstract

Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs)-based gait analysis is a promising and attractive approach for user recognition. Recently, the adoption of deep learning techniques has gained significant performance improvement. However, most existing studies focused on exploiting the spatial information of gait data (using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)) while the temporal part received little attention. In this study, we propose a new multi-model Long Short-term Memory (LSTM) network for learning the gait temporal features. First, we observe that LSTM is able to capture the pattern hidden inside the gait data sequences that are out-of-synchronization. Thus, instead of using the gait cycle-based segment, our model accepts the gait cycle-free segment (i.e., fixed-length window) as the input. By this, the classification task does not depend on the gait cycle detection task, which usually suffers from noise and bias. Second, we propose a new LSTM network architecture, in which, one LSTM is used for each gait data channel and a group of consecutive signals is processed in each step. This strategy allows the network to effectively handle the long input data sequence and achieve improved performance compared to existing LSTM-based gait models. In addition, besides using the LSTM alone, we extend it by combining with a CNN model to construct a hybrid network, which further improves the recognition performance. We evaluated our LSTM and hybrid networks under different settings using the whuGAIT and OU-ISIR datasets. The experiments showed that our LSTM network outperformed the existing LSTM networks, and its combination with CNN established new state-of-the-art performance on both the verification and identification tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3056880

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tran et al. proposed an IMU-based gait recognition approach using LSTMs, achieving state-of-the-art performance for verification and identification on whuGAIT and OU-ISIR.

    “Recently, Tran et al. [103] proposed an Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs)-based gait recognition approach. The authors employed LSTMs to exploit the temporal information on video sequences, thus extracting hidden patterns inside such sequences. Experiments conducted over whuGAIT [141] and OU-ISIR [59] provided state-of-the-art performance for both verification and identification tasks.”

    From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Introduction and Conclusion describe an IMU-based LSTM approach evaluated on whuGAIT and OU-ISIR; they report state-of-the-art identification and verification performance for the hybrid LSTM–CNN model. The claim's reference to video sequences is unsupported: the LSTMs process IMU gait-data sequences, not video. The source also does not claim state-of-the-art performance for LSTM alone. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. S. A. Niyogi and E. H. Adelson, ''Analyzing and recognizing walking figures in XYT,'' in Proc. CVPR, vol. 94, Jun. 1994, pp. 469-474. VOLUME 9, 2021
  2. L. Wang, T. Tan, H. Ning, and W. Hu, ''Silhouette analysis-based gait recognition for human identification,'' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1505-1518, Dec. 2003.
  3. J. Han and B. Bhanu, ''Individual recognition using gait energy image,'' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 316-322, Feb. 2006.
  4. Z. Liu and S. Sarkar, ''Improved gait recognition by gait dynamics nor- malization,'' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 863-876, Jun. 2006.
  5. D. Tao, X. Li, X. Wu, and S. J. Maybank, ''General tensor discriminant analysis and Gabor features for gait recognition,'' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1700-1715, Oct. 2007.
  6. K. Nakajima, Y. Mizukami, K. Tanaka, and T. Tamura, ''Footprint- based personal recognition,'' IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1534-1537, Nov. 2000.
  7. J. Jenkins and C. Ellis, ''Using ground reaction forces from gait analysis: Body mass as a weak biometric,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Pervasive Comput. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2007, pp. 251-267.
  8. T. C. Pataky, T. Mu, K. Bosch, D. Rosenbaum, and J. Y. Goulermas, ''Gait recognition: Highly unique dynamic plantar pressure patterns among 104 individuals,'' J. Roy. Soc. Interface, vol. 9, no. 69, pp. 790-800, 2012.
  9. C. Wan, L. Wang, and V. V. Phoha, ''A survey on gait recognition,'' ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1-35, 2018.
  10. J. P. Singh, S. Jain, S. Arora, and U. P. Singh, ''Vision-based gait recogni- tion: A survey,'' IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 70497-70527, 2018.
  11. H. J. Ailisto, M. Lindholm, J. Mantyjarvi, E. Vildjiounaite, and S.-M. Makela, ''Identifying people from gait pattern with accelerometers,'' Proc. SPIE, vol. 5779, pp. 7-14, Mar. 2005.
  12. S. Sprager and M. B. Juric, ''Inertial sensor-based gait recognition: A review,'' IEEE Sensors J., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 22089-22127, Sep. 2015.
  13. M. D. Marsico and A. Mecca, ''A survey on gait recognition via wearable sensors,'' ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1-39, 2019.
  14. O. Costilla-Reyes, R. Vera-Rodriguez, A. S. Alharthi, S. U. Yunas, and K. B. Ozanyan, ''Deep learning in gait analysis for security and healthcare,'' in Deep Learning: Algorithms and Applications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020, pp. 299-334.
  15. K.-T. Nguyen, T.-L. Vo-Tran, D.-T. Dinh, and M.-T. Tran, ''Gait recogni- tion with multi-region size convolutional neural network for authentication with wearable sensors,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Future Data Secur. Eng. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 197-212.
  16. M. Gadaleta and M. Rossi, ''IDNet: Smartphone-based gait recognition with convolutional neural networks,'' Pattern Recognit., vol. 74, pp. 25-37, Feb. 2018.
  17. R. Delgado-Escaño, F. M. Castro, J. R. Cózar, M. J. Marín-Jiménez, and N. Guil, ''An end-to-end multi-task and fusion CNN for inertial-based gait recognition,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 1897-1908, 2019.
  18. Q. Zou, Y. Wang, Q. Wang, Y. Zhao, and Q. Li, ''Deep learning-based gait recognition using smartphones in the wild,'' IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 15, pp. 3197-3212, 2020.
  19. L. Tran and D. Choi, ''Data augmentation for inertial sensor-based gait deep neural network,'' IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 12364-12378, 2020.
  20. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, ''Long short-term memory,'' Neural Comput., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997.
  21. P. Fernandez-Lopez, J. Liu-Jimenez, K. Kiyokawa, Y. Wu, and R. Sanchez-Reillo, ''Recurrent neural network for inertial gait user recognition in smartphones,'' Sensors, vol. 19, no. 18, p. 4054, 2019.
  22. V. N. Bobić, M. D. Djurić-Jovièić, S. M. Radovanović, N. T. Dragaević, V. S. Kostić, and M. B. Popović, ''Challenges of stride segmentation and their implementation for impaired gait,'' in Proc. 40th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), Jul. 2018, pp. 2284-2287.
  23. S. Bai, J. Z. Kolter, and V. Koltun, ''An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling,'' 2018, arXiv:1803.01271. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01271 · arXiv
  24. B. Schölkopf, R. C. Williamson, A. J. Smola, J. Shawe-Taylor, and J. C. Platt, ''Support vector method for novelty detection,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 12, 2000, pp. 582-588.
  25. T. T. Ngo, Y. Makihara, H. Nagahara, Y. Mukaigawa, and Y. Yagi, ''The largest inertial sensor-based gait database and performance evalu- ation of gait-based personal authentication,'' Pattern Recognit., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 228-237, 2014.
  26. G. Batchuluun, H. S. Yoon, J. K. Kang, and K. R. Park, ''Gait-based human identification by combining shallow convolutional neural network-stacked long short-term memory and deep convolutional neural network,'' IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 63164-63186, 2018.
  27. T. K. M. Lee, M. Belkhatir, and S. Sanei, ''A comprehensive review of past and present vision-based techniques for gait recognition,'' Multimedia Tools Appl., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 2833-2869, 2014.
  28. C. Prakash, R. Kumar, and N. Mittal, ''Recent developments in human gait research: Parameters, approaches, applications, machine learning tech- niques, datasets and challenges,'' Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1-40, Jan. 2018.
  29. T. Hoang, D. Choi, and T. Nguyen, ''On the instability of sensor orientation in gait verification on mobile phone,'' in Proc. 12th Int. Joint Conf. E-Bus. Telecommun. (ICETE), vol. 4, Jul. 2015, pp. 148-159.
  30. G. Giorgi, F. Martinelli, A. Saracino, and M. Sheikhalishahi, ''Try walking in my shoes, if you can: Accurate gait recognition through deep learning,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Saf., Rel., Secur. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, pp. 384-395.
  31. O. Dehzangi, M. Taherisadr, and R. ChangalVala, ''IMU-based gait recog- nition using convolutional neural networks and multi-sensor fusion,'' Sen- sors, vol. 17, no. 12, p. 2735, 2017.
  32. K. Cho, B. van Merrienboer, C. Gulcehre, D. Bahdanau, F. Bougares, H. Schwenk, and Y. Bengio, ''Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation,'' 2014, arXiv:1406.1078. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1078 · arXiv
  33. T. Ji and A. Pachi, ''Frequency and velocity of people walking,'' Struct. Eng., vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 36-40, 2005.
  34. Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani, ''A theoretically grounded application of dropout in recurrent neural networks,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2016, pp. 1019-1027.
  35. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, ''Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), Dec. 2015, pp. 1026-1034.
  36. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, ''6.5 back-propagation and other differentiation algorithms,'' Deep Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 200-220, 2016.
  37. R. Hanka and T. P. Harte, ''Curse of dimensionality: Classifying large multi-dimensional images with neural networks,'' in Computer Intensive Methods in Control and Signal Processing. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 1997, pp. 249-260.
  38. Y. Zhong and Y. Deng, ''Sensor orientation invariant mobile gait biomet- rics,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Joint Conf. Biometrics, Oct. 2014, pp. 1-8.
  39. S. Sprager and M. B. Juric, ''An efficient HOS-based gait authentication of accelerometer data,'' IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1486-1498, Jul. 2015.
  40. R. Subramanian and S. Sarkar, ''Evaluation of algorithms for orientation invariant inertial gait matching,'' IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 304-318, Feb. 2019.
  41. Z. Wei, W. Qinghui, D. Muqing, and L. Yiqi, ''A new inertial sensor-based gait recognition method via deterministic learning,'' in Proc. 34th Chin. Control Conf. (CCC), Jul. 2015, pp. 3908-3913.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tran, L., Hoang, T., Nguyen, T., Kim, H., & Choi, D.
Affiliations
  • Chonnam National University (KR)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Ho Chi Minh City University of Science (VN)
  • Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
23826-23839
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126566816
Cited by
90
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant by the Korean Government, Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2020-0-00126)
  • Vietnam National University (NCM2019-18-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
gait recognition, inertial measurement unit, long short-term memory networks, temporal feature extraction, user identification, user verification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review