CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51Educational Games and GamificationOnline Learning and AnalyticsInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences

Escapp: A Web Platform for Conducting Educational Escape Rooms

Open access
Lopez-Pernas, Sonsoles, Gordillo, Aldo, Barra, Enrique, Quemada, Juan·2021·IEEE Access
DOI 10.1109/access.2021.3063711
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Educational escape rooms are emerging as a new type of learning activity with the potential to enhance students' learning through highly engaging experiences. However, conducting educational escape rooms effectively is very complex and there are no software tools available for this purpose. This lack of support is hindering the widespread use and adoption of these activities. This article presents Escapp, a web platform that allows teachers to conduct effective and highly engaging educational escape rooms. The platform has been used for conducting three different educational escape rooms (one face-to-face and two remotely) in three higher education settings. Three case studies were conducted to empirically evaluate the usefulness of Escapp for conducting these activities, which involved more than 400 students. On the one hand, a questionnaire was administered to students to gather their opinions on the Escapp platform, obtaining very positive results in terms of overall usefulness, usability and engagement. On the other hand, data automatically recorded by Escapp during the three educational escape rooms are presented as evidence of the high number of student interactions that take place during activities of this kind and the need of using a software system for conducting them in an effective way. The results of this article show that Escapp is a well-suited solution for conducting effective face-to-face and remote educational escape rooms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3063711

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. R. Pan, H. Lo, and C. Neustaedter, ''Collaboration, awareness, and com- munication in real-life escape rooms,'' in Proc. Conf. Designing Interact. Syst., Jun. 2017, pp. 1353-1364.
  2. H. Warmelink, I. Mayer, J. Weber, B. Heijligers, M. Haggis, E. Peters, and M. Louwerse, ''AMELIO: Evaluating the team-building potential of a mixed reality escape room game,'' in Proc. Extended Abstr. Publication Annu. Symp. Comput.-Hum. Interact. Play, Oct. 2017, pp. 111-123.
  3. C. Wu, H. Wagenschutz, and J. Hein, ''Promoting leadership and team- work development through escape rooms,'' Med. Educ., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 561-562, May 2018.
  4. P. Williams, ''Using escape room-like puzzles to teach undergraduate students effective and efficient group process skills,'' in Proc. IEEE Integr. STEM Educ. Conf. (ISEC), Mar. 2018, pp. 254-257.
  5. C. McFadden and S. Porter, ''Augmented reality escape rooms as high-engagement educational resources,'' in Proc. ICERI, Nov. 2018, pp. 4361-4365.
  6. V. Adams, S. Burger, K. Crawford, and R. Setter, ''Can you escape? Creating an escape room to facilitate active learning,'' J. Nurses Prof. Develop., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. E1-E5, 2018.
  7. J. L. Gómez-Urquiza, J. Gómez-Salgado, L. Albendín-García, M. Correa-Rodríguez, E. González-Jiménez, and G. A. Cañadas-De la Fuente, ''The impact on nursing students' opinions and motivation of using a 'nursing escape room' as a teaching game: A descriptive study,'' Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 72, pp. 73-76, Jan. 2019.
  8. N. Brown, W. Darby, and H. Coronel, ''An escape room as a simulation teaching strategy,'' Clin. Simul. Nursing, vol. 30, pp. 1-6, May 2019.
  9. A. E. Kinio, L. Dufresne, T. Brandys, and P. Jetty, ''Break out of the classroom: The use of escape rooms as an alternative teaching strategy in surgical education,'' J. Surgical Educ., vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 134-139, Jan. 2019.
  10. J. Guckian, A. Sridhar, and S. J. Meggitt, ''Exploring the perspectives of dermatology undergraduates with an escape room game,'' Clin. Experim. Dermatology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 153-158, Mar. 2020.
  11. M. Boysen-Osborn, S. Paradise, and J. Suchard, ''The toxiscape hunt: An escape room-scavenger hunt for toxicology education,'' J. Educ. Teach. Emerg. Med., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9-19, 2018.
  12. K. Jambhekar, R. P. Pahls, and L. A. Deloney, ''Benefits of an escape room as a novel educational activity for radiology residents,'' Academic Radiol., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 276-283, Feb. 2020.
  13. S. R. Monaghan and S. Nicholson, ''Bringing escape room concepts to pathophysiology case studies,'' HAPS Educator, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 49-65, Aug. 2017.
  14. C. Jiménez Sánchez, R. Lafuente Ureta, M. Ortiz Lucas, L. Bruton, and V. Millán Luna, ''Room escape: Propuesta de Gamificación en el grado de fisioterapia,'' in Proc. Libro de Actas IN-RED III Congreso Nacional de Innovación Educativa y de Docencia en Red, Jul. 2017, pp. 537-551.
  15. J. Cain, ''Exploratory implementation of a blended format escape room in a large enrollment pharmacy management class,'' Currents Pharmacy Teach. Learn., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 44-50, Jan. 2019.
  16. M. Hermanns, B. Deal, A. M. Campbell, S. Hillhouse, J. B. Opella, C. Faigle, and R. H. Campbell IV, ''Using an 'escape room' toolbox approach to enhance pharmacology education,'' J. Nurs. Educ. Pract., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 89-95, 2018.
  17. A. Clauson, L. Hahn, T. Frame, A. Hagan, L. A. Bynum, M. E. Thompson, and K. Kiningham, ''An innovative escape room activity to assess student readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs),'' Currents Pharmacy Teach. Learn., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 723-728, Jul. 2019.
  18. L. M. Caldas, H. N. Eukel, A. T. Matulewicz, E. V. Fernández, and K. L. Donohoe, ''Applying educational gaming success to a nonsterile compounding escape room,'' Currents Pharmacy Teach. Learn., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1049-1054, Oct. 2019.
  19. H. N. Eukel, J. E. Frenzel, and D. Cernusca, ''Educational gaming for pharmacy students-Design and evaluation of a diabetes-themed escape room,'' Amer. J. Pharmaceutical Educ., vol. 81, no. 7, p. 6265, Sep. 2017.
  20. S. Cotner, K. M. Smith, L. Simpson, D. S. Burgess, and J. Cain, ''1311. Incorporating an 'escape room' game design in infectious diseases instruc- tion,'' Open Forum Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, no. 1, p. S401, Nov. 2018.
  21. H. Eukel, J. Frenzel, K. Frazier, and M. Miller, ''Unlocking student engagement: Creation, adaptation, and application of an educational escape room across three pharmacy campuses,'' Simul. Gaming, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 167-179, Apr. 2020.
  22. A. I. V. Vörös and Z. Sárközi, ''Physics escape room as an educational tool,'' AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1916, Dec. 2017, Art. no. 050002. [Online]. Available: http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.5017455 · DOI
  23. N. Dietrich, ''Escape classroom: The leblanc process-An educational 'escape game,''' J. Chem. Educ., vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 996-999, Jun. 2018.
  24. M. Ferreiro-González, A. Amores-Arrocha, E. Espada-Bellido, M. J. Aliaño-Gonzalez, M. Vázquez-Espinosa, A. V. González-de-Peredo, P. Sancho-Galán, J. Á. Álvarez-Saura, G. F. Barbero, and C. Cejudo-Bastante, ''Escape ClassRoom: Can you solve a crime using the analytical process?'' J. Chem. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 267-273, Feb. 2019.
  25. M. J. Vergne, J. D. Smith, and R. S. Bowen, ''Escape the (remote) class- room: An online escape room for remote learning,'' J. Chem. Educ., vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2845-2848, Sep. 2020.
  26. J. W. J. Ang, Y. N. A. Ng, and R. S. Liew, ''Physical and digital educational escape room for teaching chemical bonding,'' J. Chem. Educ., vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 2849-2856, Sep. 2020.
  27. D. de la Flor, J. A. Calles, J. J. Espada, and R. Rodríguez, ''Application of escape lab-room to heat transfer evaluation for chemical engineers,'' Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 33, pp. 9-16, Oct. 2020.
  28. M. Monnot, S. Laborie, G. Hébrard, and N. Dietrich, ''New approaches to adapt escape game activities to large audience in chemical engineering: Numeric supports and students' participation,'' Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 32, pp. 50-58, Jul. 2020.
  29. S. C. Brady and E. C. Andersen, ''An escape-room inspired game for genetics review,'' J. Biol. Educ., pp. 1-12, Dec. 2019.
  30. S. Mystakidis, E. Cachafeiro, and I. Hatzilygeroudis, ''Enter the serious E-scape room: A cost-effective serious game model for deep and mean- ingful E-learning,'' in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Inf., Intell., Syst. Appl. (IISA), Jul. 2019, pp. 1-6.
  31. A. M. Ho, ''Unlocking ideas: Using escape room puzzles in a cryptography classroom,'' Primus, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 835-847, Oct. 2018.
  32. C. Jiménez, N. Arís, Á. A. Magreñán Ruiz, and L. Orcos, ''Digital escape room, using Genial.Ly and a breakout to learn algebra at secondary educa- tion level in Spain,'' Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 10, p. 271, Oct. 2020.
  33. A. Fuentes-Cabrera, M. E. Parra-González, J. López-Belmonte, and A. Segura-Robles, ''Learning mathematics with emerging methodologies-The escape room as a case study,'' Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 1586, 2020.
  34. S. Lopez-Pernas, A. Gordillo, E. Barra, and J. Quemada, ''Examining the use of an educational escape room for teaching programming in a higher education setting,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 31723-31737, 2019.
  35. S. Lopez-Pernas, A. Gordillo, E. Barra, and J. Quemada, ''Analyzing learning effectiveness and students' perceptions of an educational escape room in a programming course in higher education,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 184221-184234, 2019.
  36. A. Gordillo, D. Lopez-Fernandez, S. Lopez-Pernas, and J. Quemada, ''Evaluating an educational escape room conducted remotely for teaching software engineering,'' IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 225032-225051, 2020.
  37. C. Borrego, C. Fernández, I. Blanes, and S. Robles, ''Room escape at class: Escape games activities to facilitate the motivation and learning in computer science,'' J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 162-171, 2017.
  38. S.-Y. Huang, Y.-H. Kuo, and H.-C. Chen, ''Applying digital escape rooms infused with science teaching in elementary school: Learning performance, learning motivation, and problem-solving ability,'' Thinking Skills Creativ- ity, vol. 37, Sep. 2020, Art. no. 100681.
  39. A. Veldkamp, L. van de Grint, M.-C.-P. J. Knippels, and W. R. van Joolingen, ''Escape education: A systematic review on escape rooms in education,'' Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 31, Nov. 2020, Art. no. 100364.
  40. P. Fotaris and T. Mastoras, ''Escape rooms for learning: A system- atic review,'' in Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. Games Based Learn. (ECGBL), Oct. 2019, pp. 235-243.
  41. M. Arnal, J. M. García, and I. D. Tosso, ''Escape rooms as a way to teach magnitudes and measure in degrees in education,'' in Proc. 8th New Perspect. Sci. Educ. Conf., 2019, Art. no. EST3640.
  42. R. Ross, ''Design of an open-source decoder for educational escape rooms,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 145777-145783, 2019.
  43. G. Guigon, M. Vermeulen, and J. Humeau, ''A creation tool for serious puz- zle games,'' in Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Comput. Supported Educ., May 2019, pp. 556-561.
  44. A. J. Guarascio, B. D. Nemecek, and D. E. Zimmerman, ''Evaluation of students' perceptions of the socrative application versus a traditional stu- dent response system and its impact on classroom engagement,'' Currents Pharmacy Teach. Learn., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 808-812, Sep. 2017.
  45. I. Vallet-Bellmunt, T. Vallet-Bellmunt, E. Zubiria-Ferriols, T. Martínez-Fernández, and I. Bel-Oms, ''Un estudio comparativo entre dos herramientas de respuesta de audiencia en las aulas universitarias,'' Revista Perspectiva Empresarial, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61-73, Mar. 2019.
  46. D. O. Göksün and G. Gürsoy, ''Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via kahoot and quizizz,'' Comput. Educ., vol. 135, pp. 15-29, Jul. 2019.
  47. P. M. Wong and M. M. Yunus, ''Enhancing writing vocabulary using men- timeter,'' Int. J. Learn., Teaching Educ. Res., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 106-122, Mar. 2020.
  48. D. DeWitt, N. Alias, and S. Siraj, ''Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using Padlet in a higher education institution,'' in Proc. Int. Educ. Technol. Conf. (IETC), 2015, pp. 88-95.
  49. K. Verspoor and J. Nicholson, ''E-learning with Kaggle in class: Adapting the ALTA shared task 2013 to a class project,'' in Proc. Australas. Lang. Technol. Assoc. Workshop, Dec. 2013, pp. 142-145.
  50. V. A. Rosales, C. Queiruga, C. B. Tzancoff, I. M. Kimura, and M. B. Bartneche, ''Programming competitions in high school classrooms: RITA en RED,'' in Proc. 53th Latin Amer. Comput. Conf. (CLEI), Sep. 2017, pp. 1-8.
  51. S. Wasik, M. Antczak, J. Badura, A. Laskowski, and T. Sternal, ''A survey on online judge systems and their applications,'' ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1-34, Apr. 2018.
  52. J. P. Leal and F. Silva, ''Mooshak: A Web-based multi-site programming contest system,'' Softw., Pract. Exper., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 567-581, 2003.
  53. G. Robles, J. M. Gonzalez-Barahona, and A. Moral, ''A synchronous on- line competition software to improve and motivate learning,'' in Proc. IEEE Global Eng. Educ. Conf. (EDUCON), Apr. 2012, pp. 1-8.
  54. A. Mavridis and T. Tsiatsos, ''FGAWeb: A Web platform for administrat- ing flexible games in education,'' in Proc. IEEE Global Eng. Educ. Conf. (EDUCON), Apr. 2017, pp. 1858-1862.
  55. K. Chung, ''Live lesson: Lowering the barriers to capture the flag admin- istration and participation,'' in Proc. USENIX Workshop Adv. Secur. Educ., 2017.
  56. S. Wi, J. Choi, and S. K. Cha, ''GIT-based CTF: A simple and effective approach to organizing in-course attack-and-defense security competi- tion,'' in Proc. USENIX Workshop Adv. Secur. Educ. (ASE), 2018, pp. 1-9.
  57. P. Matias, P. Barbosa, T. N. C. Cardoso, D. M. Campos, and D. F. Aranha, ''NIZKCTF: A noninteractive zero-knowledge capture-the-flag platform,'' IEEE Secur. Privacy, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 42-51, Nov. 2018.
  58. S. López-Pernas, A. Gordillo, E. Barra, and J. Quemada, ''Identification and analysis of requirements for a Web platform for managing educational escape rooms,'' in Proc. ICERI, Nov. 2019, pp. 4874-4883.
  59. B. Walsh and M. Spence, ''Leveraging escape room popularity to provide first-year students with an introduction to engineering information,'' in Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc., Dec. 2018, pp. 1-6.
  60. S. Nicholson, ''Ask why: Creating a better player experience through environmental storytelling and consistency in escape room design,'' in Meaningful Play. Lansing, MI, USA: ETC Press, 2016, pp. 1-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez-Pernas, S., Gordillo, A., Barra, E., & Quemada, J.
Affiliations
  • Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas Telemáticos, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Access
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
38062-38077
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/access.2021.3063711
OpenAlex
W3133963609
Cited by
51
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archivo Digital UPM (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) through the educational innovation projects (IE1819.0905, IE1920.6105)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Keywords
educational escape rooms, web platform, game-based learning, student engagement, distance education, higher education, student interaction, usability, learning analytics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review