Cited by 66Microwave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A YOLOv3 Deep Neural Network Model to Detect Brain Tumor in Portable Electromagnetic Imaging System

Open access

Abstract

This paper presents the detection of brain tumors through the YOLOv3 deep neural network model in a portable electromagnetic (EM) imaging system. YOLOv3 is a popular object detection model with high accuracy and improved computational speed. Initially, the scattering parameters are collected from the nine-antenna array setup with a tissue-mimicking head phantom, where one antenna acts as a transmitter and the other eight antennas act as receivers. The images are then reconstructed from the post-processed scattering parameters by applying the modified delay-multiply-and-sum algorithm that contains 416×416 pixels. Fifty sample images are collected from the different head regions through the EM imaging system. The images are later augmented to generate a final image data set for training, validation, and testing, where the data set contains 1000 images, including fifty samples with a single and double tumor. 80% of the images are utilized for training the network, whereas 10% are used for validation, and the rest 10% are utilized for testing purposes. The detection performance is investigated with the different image data sets. The achieved detection accuracy and F1 scores are 95.62% and 94.50%, respectively, which ensure better detection accuracy. The training accuracy and validation losses are 96.74% and 9.21%, respectively. The tumor detection with its location in different cases from the testing images is evaluated through YOLOv3, which demonstrates its potential in the portable electromagnetic head imaging system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3086624

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_44 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/VCIP.2017.8305148 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/LAWP.2020.2995455 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027805 · DOI
  5. i??n, 2016, Review of MRI-based brain tumor image segmentation using deep learning methods, Procedia Comput Sci, 102, 317, 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.407 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/TAP.2020.2978952 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2017.8072467 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2018.8609005 · DOI
  9. 10.23919/EuCAP48036.2020.9136081 · DOI
  10. 10.3390/jimaging6080080 · DOI
  11. 10.3390/s20051354 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2340409 · DOI
  13. 10.1155/2018/8241438 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069712 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TAP.2019.2908066 · DOI
  16. salleh, 2020, Development of microwave brain stroke imaging system using multiple antipodal vivaldi antennas based on raspberry Pi technology, J Kejuruterran, 32, 1
  17. salleh, 2019, Development of antipodal Vivaldi antenna for microwave brain stroke imaging system, Int J Eng Technol, 8, 162, 10.14419/ijet.v8i3.19933 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TAP.2018.2871266 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TAP.2019.2938849 · DOI
  20. 10.1155/2019/4074862 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TAP.2016.2560909 · DOI
  22. lu, 2020, Human-expert-level brain tumor detection using deep learning with data distillation and augmentation, arXiv 2006 12285
  23. 10.2214/AJR.09.3486 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/EUROCON.2017.8011175 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/TIM.2013.2277562 · DOI
  26. 10.1148/rg.274065115 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.fcij.2017.12.001 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/978-1-4419-1681-5_2 · DOI
  29. 10.3390/ma13214918 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/mop.30770 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029595 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/TBCAS.2018.2878057 · DOI
  33. schapira, 2021, Brain tumor statistics
  34. 10.1038/s41598-019-51620-z · DOI
  35. sobhaninia, 2018, Brain tumor segmentation using deep learning by type specific sorting of images, arXiv 1809 07786
  36. 10.1109/LAWP.2016.2565610 · DOI
  37. redmon, 2018, YOLOv3: An incremental improvement, arXiv 1804 02767
  38. 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2386852 · DOI
  39. 10.1155/2019/8065036 · DOI
  40. 10.1155/2020/6402149 · DOI
  41. 10.1109/TMI.2020.2969682 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.690 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1007/s00542-018-3919-x · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hossain, A., Islam, M. T., Islam, M. S., Chowdhury, M. E. H., Almutairi, A. F., Razouqi, Q. A., & Misran, N.
Affiliations
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • Kuwait University (KW)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
82647-82660
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3169811901
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
brain tumor detection, YOLOv3, portable imaging system, antenna arrays, S-parameters, object detection, data augmentation, tumor localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review