User Context Ontology for Adaptive Mobile-Phone Interfaces
Open accessAbstract
The Adaptive User Interface (AUI) adapts to the changes in the context of use and provides improved interaction abilities for different users. The adaptivity in the user interfaces requires in depth knowledge of context. There is a need to enrich user profiles to achieve the personalized services with the ability to adapt the user's context. The context can be reflected in a particular kind of knowledge and hence modeled as ontology. Ontology based context models are effective means to handle complex situations that support the sharing or integration of context information. This paper presents ontology based context model using OWL for adaptive mobile devices. It models the context over its four major elements including device, user, environment (location and time) and activity. The proposed ontology was derived in different classes, relationships, associations, dependencies and constraints to model dynamic context. Ontologies present a standardized, consistent and shareable context model. The context model and consequent context snapshots can be acknowledged by AUI to present a suitable user interface. The ontology was developed using Protégé on the basis of each context type having different values. Semantic querying (SPARQL) was used for knowledge acquisition. Moreover, the Pellet and HermiT Reasoner were used to verify the rules, relations and constraints to avoid the inconsistency between classes. Comparative to other context models for adaptive interfaces, ontological model provides more of scalability and growth with learning new context in to the shared context knowledge.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ontology encompasses four major sources of contextual information: device, user/identity, environment, and time.
“The ontology encompasses four major sources of contextual information: device, user/identity, environment, and time (Iqbal et al. 2021).”
From AdaptUI: A Framework for the development of Adaptive User Interfaces in Smart Product-Service Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Iqbal et al. 2021
The Taxonomy section names the ontology’s four basic context concepts as user, environment, device, and activity—not time. The Context Elements section repeats that list. Time appears as contextual information, but the paper does not make it the fourth major concept. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 36
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 2008, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 148-157.
- D. Arechiga, J. Vegas, and P. De La Fuente Redondo, ''Ontology sup- ported personalized search for mobile devices,'' in Proc. CEUR Workshop, vol. 460, 2009, pp. 1-12.
- S. Abburu, ''A Survey on ontology reasoner and comparison,'' Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 57, no. 17, pp. 33-39, 2012.
- Authors
- Iqbal, M. W., Ch, N. A., Shahzad, S. K., Naqvi, M. R., Khan, B. A., & Ali, Z.
- Affiliations
- Superior University (PK)
- University of Management and Technology (PK)
- École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Tarbes (FR)
- National University of Technology (PK)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 96751-96762
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3178344234
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- adaptive user interfaces, context modeling, ontology (information science), mobile devices, user profiles, personalized services, owls, context-aware computing, semantic queries, SPARQL, dynamic context, knowledge sharing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review