The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parameterized Energy-Optimal Regenerative Braking Strategy for Connected and Autonomous Electrified Vehicles: A Real-Time Dynamic Programming Approach
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a vehicle speed planning system called the energy-optimal deceleration planning system (EDPS), which aims to maximize energy recuperation of regenerative braking of connected and autonomous electrified vehicles. A recuperation energy-optimal speed profile is computed based on the impending deceleration requirements for turning or stopping at an intersection. This is computed to maximize the regenerative braking energy while satisfying the physical limits of an electrified powertrain. To obtain smooth optimal deceleration speed profiles, optimal deceleration commands are determined by a parameterized polynomial-based deceleration model that is obtained by regression analyses with real vehicle driving test data. The design parameters are dependent on preview information such as residual time and distance as well as target speed. The key design parameter is deceleration time, which determines the deceleration speed profile to satisfy the residual time and distance constraints as well as the target speed requirement. The time-varying bounds of deceleration commands corresponding to the physical limits of the powertrain are deduced from realistic deceleration test driving. For validation and comparisons of the EDPS with different preview distances, driving simulation tests with a virtual road environment and vehicle-to-infrastructure connectivity are presented. It is shown that the longer preview distance in the EDPS, the more energy-recuperation. In comparison with driver-in-the-loop simulation tests, EDPS-based autonomous driving shows improvements in energy recuperation and reduction in trip time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Without solid load forecasting and predictive analytics, such integration of EV charging with such sources could affect the stability of the power system [56].”
From Economic Impacts and Mitigation for the Grid Connected Electric Vehicle Charging: A Technical and Operational Overview (2026) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“However, the success of smart charging depends on the development of smart grid [56].”
From Economic Impacts and Mitigation for the Grid Connected Electric Vehicle Charging: A Technical and Operational Overview (2026) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Policy instruments such as ToU pricing and improvements of net metering are necessary for promoting RES-EV synergy [56].”
From Economic Impacts and Mitigation for the Grid Connected Electric Vehicle Charging: A Technical and Operational Overview (2026) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1109/TITS.2014.2319812 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.011 · DOI
- 10.1109/TITS.2018.2794509 · DOI
- 10.1049/cp.2016.1164 · DOI
- 10.1080/00423114.2011.582122 · DOI
- koch-groeber, 2014, Criteria for coasting on highways for passenger cars
- 10.1287/trsc.21.1.36 · DOI
- 10.7467/KSAE.2017.25.3.287 · DOI
- ehsani, 2018, Modern Electric Hybrid Electric Fuel Cell Vehicles
- 10.1007/978-3-642-35913-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trc.2018.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-60934-8_10 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-53165-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1109/JPROC.2011.2112750 · DOI
- kim, 2020, Energy-optimal regenerative braking strategy for connected and autonomous electrified vehicles: A practical design and implementation for real-world commercial PHEVs, Proc IEEE Int Conf Intell Transp Syst, 1020
- 10.23919/ACC.2019.8814905 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ikhajangbe, O. E., Dhulipati, H., & Liu, S. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3684508 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, D., Eo, J. S., & Kim, K.-K. K.
- Affiliations
- Hyundai Motor Group (South Korea) (KR)
- Inha University (KR)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 103167-103183
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3129879145
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Hyundai Motor Company
- Inha University Research Grant (INHA-60703)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
- Keywords
- regenerative braking, energy recovery, connected and autonomous vehicles, electrified vehicles, speed profile optimization, real-time dynamic programming, vehicle-to-infrastructure communication, driver-in-the-loop simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review