The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
FogSurv: A Fog-Assisted Architecture for Urban Surveillance Using Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion
Open accessAbstract
Urban surveillance, of which airborne urban surveillance is a vital constituent, providessituational awareness(SA) and timely response to emergencies. The significance and scope of urban surveillance has increased manyfold in recent years due to the proliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Internet of things (IoTs), and multitude of sensors. In this article, we propose FogSurv—a fog-assisted surveillance architecture and framework leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and information/data fusion for enabling real-time SA and monitoring. We also propose an AI- and data-driven information fusion model for FogSurv to help provide (near) real-time SA, threat assessment, and automated decision-making. We further present a latency model for AI and information fusion processing in FogSurv. We then discuss several use cases of FogSurv that can have a huge impact on multifarious fronts of national significance ranging from safeguarding national security to monitoring of critical infrastructures. We conduct an extensive set of experiments to demonstrate that FogSurv using AI and data fusion help provide near real-time inferences and SA. Experimental results demonstrate that FogSurv provides a latency improvement of 37% on average over cloud architectures for the selected benchmarks. Results further indicate that combining AI with data fusion as in FogSurv can provide a speedup of up to$9.8\times $over AI without data fusion while also maintaining or improving the inference accuracy. Additionally, results show that AI combined with fusion of different image modalities obtained through UAVs in FogSurv results in improved average precision of target detection for surveillance as compared to AI without data fusion for different target scales and environment complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many applications, such as surveillance applications, are time-sensitive.
“many applications are time-sensitive (e.g., surveillance applications [63])”
From Image Encryption Algorithms: A Survey of Design and Evaluation Metrics (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
Image encryption algorithms that can be executed in real time are more befitting for time-sensitive applications than highly compute-intensive encryption algorithms.
“image encryption algorithms that can be executed in real time are more befitting for such applications compared to highly compute-intensive encryption algorithms.”
From Image Encryption Algorithms: A Survey of Design and Evaluation Metrics (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
The paper discusses latency in real-time surveillance and compares the execution times of data-fusion and AI methods (Section B.2, page unavailable). I searched for image encryption, real-time encryption, and encryption, but found no passage comparing encryption algorithms for time-sensitive applications. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- king, 2009, A machine learning toolkit, J Mach Learn Res, 10, 1755
- votel, 2016, Unconventional warfare in the gray zone, Joint Forces Quart, 80, 101
- 2018, List of us Mass Shootings
- 2018, 2017 Las Vegas Shooting
- boyle, 2012, The US and its UAVs A Cost-Benefit Analysis
- 2010, Eyes of the Army U S Army Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems 2010-2035
- 2021, RQ-170 Sentinel Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
- lecun, 2021, The MNIST Database of Handwritten Digits
- 2021, What is Edge Computing?
- ashitani, 2020, Darknet_Mnist
- 2021, Xeon Processor E3-1230 v5
- redmon, 2013, Darknet Open source neural networks in c
- 2021, Jetson TX2
Metadata
- Authors
- Munir, A., Kwon, J., Lee, J. H., Kong, J., Blasch, E., Aved, A. J., & Muhammad, K.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Samsung Electronics (South Korea) (KR)
- Kyungpook National University (KR)
- United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research (US)
- United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
- Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 111938-111959
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3190816602
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Information Directorate (RI) through the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) Summer Faculty Fellowship Program® (FA8750-15-3-6003, FA9550-15-0001, FA9550-20-F-0005)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Keywords
- urban surveillance, fog computing, unmanned aerial vehicles, data fusion, artificial intelligence, situational awareness, latency modeling, threat assessment, automated decision-making, multimodal image fusion, target detection, critical infrastructure monitoring, national security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review