The DOI matches its Crossref record; 157 of the 157 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comprehensive Review of Coverage Path Planning in Robotics Using Classical and Heuristic Algorithms
Open accessAbstract
The small battery capacities of the mobile robot and the un-optimized planning efficiency of the industrial robot bottlenecked the time efficiency and productivity rate of coverage tasks in terms of speed and accuracy, putting a great constraint on the usability of the robot applications in various planning strategies in specific environmental conditions. Thus, it became highly desirable to address the optimization problems related to exploration and coverage path planning (CPP). In general, the goal of the CPP is to find an optimal coverage path with generates a collision-free trajectory by reducing the travel time, processing speed, cost energy, and the number of turns along the path length, as well as low overlapped rate, which reflect the robustness of CPP. This paper reviews the principle of CPP and discusses the development trend, including design variations and the characteristic of optimization algorithms, such as classical, heuristic, and most recent deep learning methods. Then, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of the existing CPP-based modeling in the area and target coverage. Finally, we conclude numerous open research problems of the CPP and make suggestions for future research directions to gain insights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 · Cited by 58,192
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,002
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 · Cited by 29,569
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
(2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.842673 · Cited by 24,496
Particle swarm optimization: An overview
Poli, R., Kennedy, J., & Blackwell, T. (2007) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0 · Cited by 21,101
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 · Cited by 19,343
Goldberg, D. E., & Shakespeare, W. (2002) · Cited by 16,088
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Johnson, J. D., Li, J., & Chen, Z. (2000) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(00)00324-6 · Cited by 8,414
Karaboga, D., & Basturk, B. (2007) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x · Cited by 7,651
(2007) · Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics · doi:10.1201/9781420010749-33 · Cited by 6,607
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, C. S., Mohd-Mokhtar, R., & Arshad, M. R.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 119310-119342
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3197167612
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 157
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comprehensive Review of Coverage Path Planning in Robotics Using Classical and Heuristic Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2021.3108177
- The paper
- Tan, C. S., Mohd-Mokhtar, R., & Arshad, M. R. (2021). A Comprehensive Review of Coverage Path Planning in Robotics Using Classical and Heuristic Algorithms. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3108177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.