Cited by 123Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFood Supply Chain TraceabilityFood Safety and Hygiene

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Method of Reaching Consensus on Probability of Food Safety Based on the Integration of Finite Credible Data on Block Chain

Open access

Abstract

The use of new technologies to empower the social co-governance of food safety is a consensus in the theoretical and practical fields of food safety governance modernization. Based on the innovative features of the block chain such as non-tampering, consensus mechanism, and a smart contract, this paper proposes a new method to facilitate the achievement of the effect of social co-governance of food safety. Firstly, it provides a profound analysis of the causes of food safety problems and the drawbacks of traditional centralized supervision, and proposes a solution with decentralized features and the design process of smart contracts to realize the chaining and integration of finite credible data in the process of food circulation; secondly, it constructs a mathematical model through finite credible data on the chain and obtains the probabilistic consensus results of food safety through rigorous derivation; Finally, the scheme, model and algorithm are effectively practiced through the experimental environment of mature block chain platform and provincial food supervision platform. The example shows that the market failure problem in food safety can be greatly alleviated by the non-tampering feature of block chain; the consensus results formed by the credible data uploading, model construction and data derivation through smart contracts can greatly alleviate the problem of involution of government administrative supervision; and the social co-governance capacity of food safety can be improved through information sharing with the active synergy of multiple subjects of co-governance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3108178

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. bian, 2021, Process wisdom and experience of food safety regulation in China, Journal of Food Safety Quality Inspection, 12, 1600
  2. yang, 2013, Food and drug safety focuses on supervision, Seeking Truth, 3
  3. liu, 2018, Comprehensive absorption of professional: The logic of food and drug safety regulatory system reform in the context of decentralization, J South China Normal Univ Social Sci Ed, 6, 100
  4. chen, 2017, Comparison and reference of foreign food safety social governance system, World Agriculture, 9, 176
  5. yinglian, 2016, Basic framework of national food safety strategy, China Soft Sci, 9, 18
  6. wang, 2019, Frontier hotspots and dynamic trends of food safety governance research in China, The Journal of Beijing Administrative College, 4, 35
  7. buterin, 2014, A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform
  8. shao, 2018, Blockchain technology: Architecture and progress, J Comput Sci, 41, 969
  9. cachin, 2016, Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric, Proc Workshop Distrib Cryptocurrencies Consensus Ledgers (DCCL), 1
  10. cai, 2017, Research on blockchain-based application system development method, J Softw, 28, 1474
  11. yuan, 2018, Current status and outlook of blockchain consensus algorithm development, J Autom, 44, 2011
  12. bi, 2016, Local Implementation of Food and Drug Safety ‘Four Have Two Responsibilities’ Overview Consolidate the Foundation of Supervision
  13. wang, 2018, Application of big data in China’s food and drug wisdom supervision, China Food and Drug Administration, 5, 44
  14. he, 2018, A review of blockchain-based smart contract technologies and applications, Computer Research and Development, 55, 112
  15. kõlvart, 2016, Smart Contracts
  16. ye, 2018, Security detection model of block chain, Ruan Jian Xue Bao Journal of Software, 29, 1348
  17. sheng, 2018, A block chain smart contract-based approach to IoT data assetization, J Zhejiang Univ Eng Sci Ed, 52, 2150

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 123

Metadata

Authors
Yan, L., Yin-He, S., Qian, Y., Zhi-Yu, S., Chun-Zi, W., & Zi-Yun, L.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
123764-123776
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3197813564
Cited by
123
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 28
FWCI
25.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2020F014)
  • Special Project of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education to Serve Local Areas (19JC015)
  • Project of Xi’an Science and Technology University Talents Service Enterprise (GXYD7.7)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
Keywords
food safety, blockchain, smart contracts, consensus algorithms, social co-governance, food supply chain, food safety governance, market failure, information sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review