The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Performance of Autoencoder-Based Network Anomaly Detection on NSL-KDD Dataset
Open accessAbstract
Network anomaly detection plays a crucial role as it provides an effective mechanism to block or stop cyberattacks. With the recent advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), there has been a number of Autoencoder (AE) based deep learning approaches for network anomaly detection to improve our posture towards network security. The performance of existing state-of-the-art AE models used for network anomaly detection varies without offering a holistic approach to understand the critical impacts of the core set of important performance indicators of AE models and the detection accuracy. In this study, we propose a novel 5-layer autoencoder (AE)-based model better suited for network anomaly detection tasks. Our proposal is based on the results we obtained through an extensive and rigorous investigation of several performance indicators involved in an AE model. In our proposed model, we use a new data pre-processing methodology that transforms and removes the most affected outliers from the input samples to reduce model bias caused by data imbalance across different data types in the feature set. Our proposed model utilizes the most effective reconstruction error function which plays an essential role for the model to decide whether a network traffic sample is normal or anomalous. These sets of innovative approaches and the optimal model architecture allow our model to be better equipped for feature learning and dimension reduction thus producing better detection accuracy as well as f1-score. We evaluated our proposed model on the NSL-KDD dataset which outperformed other similar methods by achieving the highest accuracy and f1-score at 90.61% and 92.26% respectively in detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey
Liu, H., & Lang, B. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9204396 · Cited by 1,133
Cited by
LSTM-Autoencoder-Based Anomaly Detection for Indoor Air Quality Time-Series Data
Wei, Y., Jang-Jaccard, J., Xu, W., Sabrina, F., Camtepe, S., & Boulic, M. (2023) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2022.3230361 · Cited by 269
Self-citationAbdel Hakeem, S. A., & Kim, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3558849 · Cited by 90
Verma, S., & Prabakeran, S. (2025) · 2025 8th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI) · doi:10.1109/icoei65986.2025.11013553 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, W., Jang-Jaccard, J., Singh, A., Wei, Y., & Sabrina, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 140136-140146
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3203072121
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Performance of Autoencoder-Based Network Anomaly Detection on NSL-KDD Dataset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2021.3116612
- The paper
- Xu, W., Jang-Jaccard, J., Singh, A., Wei, Y., & Sabrina, F. (2021). Improving Performance of Autoencoder-Based Network Anomaly Detection on NSL-KDD Dataset. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3116612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.