Cited by 38Social Robot Interaction and HRIAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Robotic Technologies in ADHD Care: Literature Review

Open access
Berrezueta-Guzman, Jonnathan, Robles-Bykbaev, Vladimir Espartaco, Pau, Ivan, Pesantez-Aviles, Fernando, Martin-Ruiz, Maria-Luisa·2022·IEEE Access

Abstract

Robotics has made it possible to change and improve many support processes for vulnerable people in different settings. In recent years, its use has been oriented toward supporting therapeutic interventions of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This review of the literature highlights how advances in robotics have evolved in different scenarios of ADHD treatment, its collaboration with other emerging technologies, its results, its limitations, and the research challenges for the future development of robotics in the field of supporting children with ADHD. The authors conducted a literature review based on the location of keywords ‘robotics’ and several NNDs such as ‘ADHD’, ’Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)’, ‘cerebral palsy’, and ‘dementia’ in titles, abstracts, and introduction of scientific articles in the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) database. The reviewed literature was classified according to the type of therapy supported by the robots, the type of robot and the associated technologies. From this analysis, we can solve the research question: Which types of robots have the potential for specific applications in ADHD treatment? Furthermore, this article shows that despite favorable technical results, robotic technologies that support ADHD therapies require significant improvements in terms of scalability, human-machine interaction, and treatment and processing of acquired information to be applied effectively in real-world therapies. The most significant research challenges are proposed to drive research efforts to develop new approaches to enable robotic assistants to participate in ADHD therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2021.3137082

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of conversational agents was predominantly investigated in relation to a broad range of mental health problems, or specifically related to cognitive and social abilities, without considering the emotional component of mental health.

    “Moreover, use of CAs was predominantly investigated in relation to a broad range of mental health problems15,16, or specifically related to cognitive and social abilities, without considering the emotional component of mental health24,25.”

    From Use of automated conversational agents in improving young population mental health: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    The portion attributed to this review says robotic interventions addressed cognitive and social abilities without considering emotion. Although the review describes social-skills interventions, its “Improvement of Traditional Therapeutic Sessions” section explicitly describes interventions targeting emotional problems and well-being; “Intervention of Educational Therapy” also describes emotion recognition and emotional guidance. The passages provided do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous reviews limited their focus to a subset of conversational agents based on the embodiment level.

    “Third, the previous reviews limited their focus to a subset of CAs based on the embodiment level, such as disembodied CAs13,20, CAs with virtual representation15, or with a physical representation23–25.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 122 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. K. Dautenhahn and A. Billard, ''Games children with autism can play with robota,'' in Universal Access and Assistive Technology: Proceedings of the Cambridge Workshop on UA and AT, vol. 2. Cambridge, U.K.: Springer, 2013, p. 179.
  2. B. Bruce, G. Thernlund, and U. Nettelbladt, ''ADHD and language impairment,'' Eur. Child Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 52-60, 2006.
  3. M. Fridin and Y. Yaakobi, ''Educational robot for children with ADHD/ADD, architecture design,'' presented at the Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Robot., Bhubaneswar, India, 2011.
  4. E. S. Castillo, C. D. Fus, R. S. Zitto, U. M. A. Rapallini, E. Velázquez, R. L. Blanc, and L. O. Lepratte, ''Modelos interactivos de aprendizaje basado en tecnología para la inclusión social de bajo costo y aplicaciones multi-usuarios,'' in Proc. XVI Workshop de Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación, 2014, pp. 1-5.
  5. C. Korzeniowsk and M. S. Ison, ''Estrategias psicoeducativas para padres y docentes de niños con TDAH,'' Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológ- ica, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 65-71, 2008.
  6. H. A. S. Padilla, J. J. D. Perera, and G. G. M. Cantarell, ''Treinamento on-line de professores para atenção de estudantes universitários com TDAH,'' RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para la Investi- gación y el Desarrollo Educativo, vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 1-27, 2020.
  7. J. M. F. Batanero and B. B. Campos, ''Actitudes docentes hacia las TIC en centros de buenas prácticas educativas con orientación inclusiva,'' Enseñanza Teaching, Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 45-61, 2012.

Authors
Berrezueta-Guzman, J., Robles-Bykbaev, V. E., Pau, I., Pesantez-Aviles, F., & Martin-Ruiz, M.-L.
Affiliations
  • Departamento de Ingeniería Telemática y Electrónica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Politecnica Salesiana University (EC)
  • GI-IATa, UNESCO Chair on Support Technologies for Educational Inclusion, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca, Ecuador
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
608-625
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206427013
Cited by
38
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
UNESCO Chair on Support Technologies for Educational Inclusion, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Ecuador
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
robotics, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD treatment, neurodevelopmental disorders, therapeutic robots, autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, dementia, human-robot interaction, assistive technology, children with ADHD, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review