Cited by 88Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance

Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Trading Automation in the Stock Market

Open access
Kabbani, Taylan, Duman, Ekrem·2022·IEEE Access

Abstract

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithms can scale to previously intractable problems. The automation of profit generation in the stock market is possible using DRL, by combining the financial assets price "prediction" step and the "allocation" step of the portfolio in one unified process to produce fully autonomous systems capable of interacting with their environment to make optimal decisions through trial and error. This work represents a DRL model to generate profitable trades in the stock market, effectively overcoming the limitations of supervised learning approaches. We formulate the trading problem as a Partially Observed Markov Decision Process (POMDP) model, considering the constraints imposed by the stock market, such as liquidity and transaction costs. We then solve the formulated POMDP problem using the Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) algorithm reporting a 2.68 Sharpe Ratio on unseen data set (test data). From the point of view of stock market forecasting and the intelligent decision-making mechanism, this paper demonstrates the superiority of DRL in financial markets over other types of machine learning and proves its credibility and advantages in strategic decision-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2022.3203697

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have focused on developing automated trading systems that can adapt to market changes and make predictions from a more generalized perspective.

    “To address this, researchers have focused on developing automated trading systems that can adapt to market changes and make predictions from a more generalized perspective [1].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kabbani, T., & Duman, E.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, Özyeðin University, Istanbul, Turkey
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
93564-93574
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294691400
Cited by
88
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Keywords
deep reinforcement learning, algorithmic trading, stock market, asset allocation, stock price prediction, partially observable Markov decision processes, TD3, Sharpe ratio, transaction costs, liquidity constraints, financial decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review