Cited by 50Information and Cyber SecurityNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Automated Emerging Cyber Threat Identification and Profiling Based on Natural Language Processing

Open access
Marinho, Renato, Holanda, Raimir·2023·IEEE Access

Abstract

The time window between the disclosure of a new cyber vulnerability and its use by cybercriminals has been getting smaller and smaller over time. Recent episodes, such as Log4j vulnerability, exemplifies this well. Within hours after the exploit being released, attackers started scanning the internet looking for vulnerable hosts to deploy threats like cryptocurrency miners and ransomware on vulnerable systems. Thus, it becomes imperative for the cybersecurity defense strategy to detect threats and their capabilities as early as possible to maximize success of prevention actions. Although crucial, discovering new threats is a challenging activity for security analysts due to the immense volume of data and information sources to be analyzed for signs that a threat is emerging. In this sense, we present a framework for automatic identification and profiling of emerging threats using Twitter messages as a source of events and MITRE ATT&CK as a source of knowledge for threat characterization. The framework comprises three main parts: identification of cyber threats and their names; profiling the identified threat in terms of its intentions or goals by employing two machine learning layers to filter and classify tweets; and alarm generation based on the threat’s risk. The main contribution of our work is the approach to characterize or profile the identified threats in terms of its intentions or goals, providing additional context on the threat and avenues for mitigation. In our experiments the profiling stage reached a F1 score of 77% in correctly profiling discovered threats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2023.3260020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marinho et al. (2023) introduced an automated cyber threat identification and profiling framework that processes Twitter messages using NLP, achieving an F1 score of 77% in correctly profiling discovered threats and maintaining a false alert rate of 15%.

    “Marinho et al. (2023) [47] introduced an automated cyber threat identification and profiling framework that processes Twitter messages using NLP to identify threats, profile them based on intentions or goals, and generate alarms, achieving an F1 score of 77% in correctly profiling discovered threats and maintaining a false alert rate of 15%.”

    From A systematic review on insider threat detection using natural language processing (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 50

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Robert David Steele. Open source intelligence: What is it? why is it important to the military? American Intelligence Journal, pages 35-41, 1996.
  2. Anna Sapienza, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Alessandro Bessi, Kristina Ler- man, and Emilio Ferrara. Discover: Mining online chatter for emerging cyber threats. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, pages 983-990, 2018.
  3. Quentin Le Sceller, ElMouatez Billah Karbab, Mourad Debbabi, and Farkhund Iqbal. Sonar: Automatic detection of cyber security events over the twitter stream. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pages 1-11, 2017.
  4. Benjamin Bengfort, Rebecca Bilbro, and Tony Ojeda. Applied text anal- ysis with python: Enabling language-aware data products with machine learning. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.", 2018.
  5. Juan Ramos et al. Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. In Proceedings of the first instructional conference on machine learning, volume 242, pages 29-48. Citeseer, 2003.
  6. Christopher D. Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Hinrich Schütze. In- troduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Authors
Marinho, R., & Holanda, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de Fortaleza (BR)
  • Graduate Program in Applied Informatics, University of Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2023
Volume
11
Pages
58915-58936
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4352977368
Cited by
50
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Morphus Labs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
emerging cyber threats, threat detection, Twitter, MITRE ATT&CK, social media security, threat intelligence, Log4j vulnerability, ransomware, cryptocurrency mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review