Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FieldPlant: A Dataset of Field Plant Images for Plant Disease Detection and Classification With Deep Learning

Open access
Moupojou, Emmanuel, Tagne, Appolinaire, Retraint, Florent, Tadonkemwa, Anicet, Wilfried, Dongmo, Tapamo, Hyppolite, Nkenlifack, Marcellin·2023·IEEE Access

Abstract

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations suggests increasing the food supply by 70% to feed the world population by 2050, although approximately one third of all food is wasted because of plant diseases or disorders. To achieve this goal, researchers have proposed many deep learning models to help farmers detect diseases in their crops as efficiently as possible to avoid yield declines. These models are usually trained on personal or public plant disease datasets such as PlantVillage or PlantDoc. PlantVillage is composed of laboratory images captured under laboratory conditions, with one leaf each and a uniform background. The models trained on this dataset have very low accuracies when running on field images with complex backgrounds and multiple leaves per image. To solve this problem, PlantDoc was built using 2,569 field images downloaded from the Internet and annotated to identify the individual leaves. However, this dataset includes some laboratory images and the absence of plant pathologists during the annotation process may have resulted in misclassification. In this study, FieldPlant is suggested as a dataset that includes 5,170 plant disease images collected directly from plantations. Manual annotation of individual leaves on each image was performed under the supervision of plant pathologists to ensure process quality. This resulted in 8,629 individual annotated leaves across the 27 disease classes. We ran various benchmarks on this dataset to evaluate state-of-the-art classification and object detection models and found that classification tasks on FieldPlant outperformed those on PlantDoc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2023.3263042

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Moupojou, E., Tagne, A., Retraint, F., Tadonkemwa, A., Wilfried, D., Tapamo, H., & Nkenlifack, M.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2023
Volume
11
Pages
35398-35410
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4361802800
Cited by
290
References
2
FWCI
40.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FieldPlant: A Dataset of Field Plant Images for Plant Disease Detection and Classification With Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2023.3263042
The paper
Moupojou, E., Tagne, A., Retraint, F., Tadonkemwa, A., Wilfried, D., Tapamo, H., & Nkenlifack, M. (2023). FieldPlant: A Dataset of Field Plant Images for Plant Disease Detection and Classification With Deep Learning. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3263042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.