Multi-sensor-based Action Monitoring and Recognition via Hybrid Descriptors and Logistic Regression
Open accessAbstract
In the fields of body-worn sensors and computer vision, current research is being done to track and detect falls and activities of daily living using the automatic recognition of human actions. In the area of human–machine communication, different combinations of sensors and communication technologies are often used to capture human action. Many researchers have also worked with artificial intelligent systems to detect actions, understand scenes, and implement systems that are more efficient in human action recognition. Although effective approaches are needed to detect outdoor activities with the combination of human actions, feature extraction can be quite a complicated task in a human activity recognition system development. Thus, this paper proposed a solution to detect human activities via hybrid descriptors based on robust features and accurate results. In this study, complex backgrounds, including multiple humans in video frames, were detected. First, inertial signal and video frames are pre-processed using denoising techniques, after which the frames are used to remove the background by detecting human motions and extracting the silhouettes. Then, these silhouettes are further used to extract the human body key points to make the human skeleton. Then the time and frequency domain features are extracted for inertial signals, and geometric features are extracted for the skeleton body points. Finally, multiple feature sets are combined and fed into a zero order optimization model, after which logistic regression is utilized to recognize each action. The proposed system has been evaluated on three benchmark datasets, including, the UP Fall dataset, the University of Rzeszow Fall dataset, and the SisFall dataset and proved its significance by achieving accuracy of 91.51%, 92.98%, and 90.23%, on the aforementioned datasets respectively.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In [166], feature extraction is performed with machine learning, movement classification with logistic regression, and optimal classification in short time.
“Feature extraction is performed with the help of machine learning, and after that, movement classification is performed with the help of logistic regression, and optimal classification is performed in a short time.”
From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [166]
The Abstract and sections B (Feature Extraction) and D (Action Recognition) describe extracting features and then using logistic regression to classify actions. The paper reports classification accuracy, but does not establish that optimal classification is achieved in a short time; the Discussion instead calls the system complex and expensive to compute. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn [166], multi-sensors are used to distinguish falls and human daily motion from human motion.
“In [166], multi-sensors are used to distinguish falls and human daily motion from human motion.”
From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [166]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Hafeez, S., Alotaibi, S. S., Alazeb, A., Mudawi, N. A., & Kim, W.
- Affiliations
- Air University (PK)
- Umm al-Qura University (SA)
- Najran University (SA)
- Gachon University (KR)
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 48145-48157
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4376480485
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Deanship of Scientific Research
- Najran University under Research Group, Funding Program (NU/RG/SERC/12/40)
- Technology Development Program
- Ministry of Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and Startups, South Korea (G21S2861919)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, fall detection, multi-sensor fusion, inertial signals, hybrid descriptors, feature extraction, logistic regression, background subtraction, silhouette, time and frequency domain features, outdoor activities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review